Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Norbert Gombos vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gombos vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Norbert Gombos vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gombos has won 42.66% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 51.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gombos, in recent form, has won 42.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 48.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.28% and 27.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gombos has saved 58.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gombos has won 30% of matches played (W/L 9/ 21), with Sandgren winning 53.57% (W/L 30/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gombos has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 254/ 179), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Gombos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28% of matches (W/L 7/ 18), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gombos winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gombos winning 1 and Sandgren winning 3. The last match between Gombos and Sandgren was at the Wimbledon - London, 29-06-2021, First, Grass with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gombos and Sandgren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gombos winning 0 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gombos winning 1, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gombos has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.77 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 278.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gombos has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gombos has converted 30.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 30.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gombos 0 - 1 Sandgren
501
Rank
80
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (515-398)
Career Total W/L
56% (420-324)
0% (0-4)
YTD W/L
60% (12-8)
$1,135,685
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Norbert Gombos | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 3 |
| Games Won | 15 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:32:0 | 2:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (72/126) | 56% (59/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (53/72) | 83% (49/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (27/54) | 72% (33/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (21/79) | 32% (29/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Norbert Gombos
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
126)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
72%
(
33 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
23 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
126)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Norbert Gombos | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/4) | 60% (12/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/8) | 62% (31/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 35% (27/51) | 53% (272/238) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.89 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 221 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:52 | 1:55:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288 | 300.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (132/247) | 60% (961/1606) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (91/132) | 78% (747/961) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (47/115) | 51% (329/645) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (4/13) | 32% (47/146) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (80/256) | 35% (575/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 59% (10/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/4) | 60% (12/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Norbert Gombos
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Norbert Gombos
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Norbert Gombos
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Norbert Gombos
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Norbert Gombos
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Norbert Gombos
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
9
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
20 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Kenny de Schepper
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gombos Vs Sandgren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
