Omar Knani vs Pedro Vives Marcos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 07:08 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Knani vs P. Vives Marcos

 TUN
0
Win
Played
0
Win

 ESP
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Knani 0 - 0 Marcos
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Knani | 0 | 
| Marcos | 0 | 
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
O. Knani vs P. V. Marcos H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
O. Knani vs P. V. Marcos Match Preview:
- In recent form, Pedro Vives Marcos secures a stronger second serve performance, winning 41.71% of points, compared to Omar Knani's 34.69%. How does this impact outcomes? Stronger second serve performance often correlates with match success.
- When it comes to returning games, Marcos significantly excels, capturing 47.69% of second serve return points versus Knani's 22.50%. Such an advantage typically tilts the scales in match predictions.
- Both players demonstrate similar efficiency on first serve returns, with Knani winning 25.81% and Marcos at 25.93%. This similarity slightly evens the playing field.
- Under pressure, Marcos exhibits a marginally better capacity to save breakpoints at 51.01%, slightly outdoing Knani's 50.00%. Does this hint at a strategic edge in tight matches? Yes, it suggests composure under pressure.
- In the past year, Marcos has a dominant win rate of 77.14%, while Knani trails with 30.00%. Such contrasts often predict the favorite in head-to-head matchups.
- Surface preferences reveal that while both players excel on Hard surfaces, Marcos leads with an impressive clay performance. How important is this? It could be crucial depending on the match surface.
- Marcos also shines at the Future/Satellite/ITF tournament level, winning 80.65% of matches compared to Knani's 31.03%, indicating a readiness for higher competition.
- When facing competition, Knani goes up against higher-ranked players (average rank of 89.73) relative to Marcos (average rank of 447.11), which may impact performance expectations.
- If the match intensifies to a deciding set, Marcos has a considerable advantage, having won 45% of such situations, while Knani has secured none.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the statistical landscape ahead of this match, Pedro Vives Marcos emerges with notable advantages in several critical areas. His second serve and return game performances significantly surpass those of his opponent, Omar Knani. These strengths are crucial in clinching victories.
Moreover, Marcos exhibits a commanding win record over the past year and shows resilience under pressure, factors that further reinforce his edge. Knani's struggle in deciding sets and against lower-ranked opponents compared to Marcos detracts from his prospects.
Considering the fact that Marcos displays superior adaptability over various tournament levels and particularly excels on clay surfaces, the decision tilts in his favor.
Thus, based on these insights, Pedro Vives Marcos is projected to be the likely winner in this upcoming tennis clash.
Omar Knani vs Pedro Vives Marcos Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
O. Knani Recent Matches Played
P. V. Marcos Recent Matches Played

O. Knani vs P. V. Marcos Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1st Match | YTD Win/Loss | 59.64% (164/111) | 
| 1st Match | Sets Win/Loss | 58.65% (356/251) | 
| 1st Match | Games Win/Loss | 53.41% (3027/2641) | 
| 1st Match | Hard Win/Loss | 58.33% (63/45) | 
| 1st Match | Clay Win/Loss | 61.25% (98/62) | 
| 1st Match | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) | 
| 1st Match | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Aces Per Game | 0.2 | 
| 1st Match | Aces Total | 553 | 
| 1st Match | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 | 
| 1st Match | Total Double Faults | 554 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:18:36 | 
| 1st Match | Average Opponent Rank | 270.79 | 
| 1st Match | 1st Serve % | 60% (8073/13541) | 
| 1st Match | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5462/8073) | 
| 1st Match | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2685/5468) | 
| 1st Match | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (686/1491) | 
| 1st Match | Return Points Win % | 42% (5823/13736) | 
| 1st Match | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (12/14) | 
| 1st Match | Futures W/L | 61.04% (152/97) | 
| 1st Match | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (161/267) | 
| 1st Match | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 1st Match | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (40/71) | 
| 1st Match | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (33/65) | 
| 1st Match | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (158/142) | 
| 1st Match | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (158/15) | 
| 1st Match | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (117/21) | 












