Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Omni Kumar vs Keegan Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumar vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Omni Kumar vs Keegan Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumar has won 55.27% of points on his second serve, while Smith has won 49.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumar, in recent form, has won 58.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 48.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.04% and 30.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumar has saved 52.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 60.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumar has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 56/ 28), with Smith winning 57.75% (W/L 41/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 123/ 68), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.59% of matches (W/L 45/ 13), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kumar winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kumar winning 2 and Smith winning 3. The last match between Kumar and Smith was at the M25 Calabasas, 26-10-2021, First, Hard with Omni Kumar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kumar and Smith have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kumar winning 1 times and Smith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Kumar winning 0, and Smith 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumar has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.64 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 175.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumar has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumar has converted 46.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 38.42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kumar 1 - 1 Smith
350
Rank
348
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
588
Rank
339
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
63% (241-141)
Career Total W/L
61% (144-92)
65% (11-6)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$20,500
Career Prize Money
$4,570
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Omni Kumar | Keegan Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 27 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (77/164) | 71% (111/156) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (59/77) | 75% (83/111) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (46/87) | 49% (22/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (51/156) | 36% (59/164) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Omni Kumar
Player
Keegan Smith
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Omni Kumar
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Omni Kumar | Keegan Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (11/6) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (24/16) | 58% (30/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (200/165) | 55% (267/222) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 60% (12/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 128 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:22 | 1:31:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 161.35 | 187.09 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (760/1181) | 71% (1011/1427) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (490/760) | 69% (702/1011) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (224/421) | 49% (202/416) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (60/123) | 39% (57/145) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (501/1164) | 39% (555/1410) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 55% (12/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Michele Ribecai
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Simon Beaupain
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kiyan Santino Kasemi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Reitano
Player
Omni Kumar
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Omni Kumar
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Elijah Strode
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Omni Kumar
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Toby Martin
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Dian Nedev
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Omni Kumar
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Keegan Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Keegan Smith
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Keegan Smith
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Keegan Smith
79%
(
85 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Geerts
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Keegan Smith
50%
(
54 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
76%
(
85 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kumar Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Omni Kumar
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
