Oscar Lacides vs Daniel Milavsky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 04:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Lacides vs D. Milavsky

GUD
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lacides 1 - 0 Milavsky
They have played 2 sets in total, with Oscar Lacides winning 2 and Daniel Milavsky winning 0. The last match between Oscar Lacides and Daniel Milavsky was at the M25 Norman, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Oscar Lacides getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lacides | 1 |
| Milavsky | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Norman(10-22-25)
O. Lacides vs D. Milavsky H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.79% (40-33) | Career Total W/L | 66.28% (57-29) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
O. Lacides vs D. Milavsky Match Preview:
- Oscar Lacides is performing notably better in second serve points, winning 48.28% in recent form, whereas Daniel Milavsky has not scored in this category. Could this impact the match outcome? Most likely, yes.
- In return games, Lacides has a strong edge, capturing 50.00% of points on opponent's second serves and 27.10% on first serves; Milavsky is yet to record a point in these areas.
- When facing breakpoints, Lacides saves 52.38%, while Milavsky is struggling, with no breakpoints saved. Under pressure, who appears steadier? Lacides.
- Looking back at the past year, Lacides has a 60.00% win rate in matches, whereas Milavsky has not secured any victories, highlighting a substantial disparity in performance.
- Both players have a 58% career win rate on their best surface, but Milavsky lacks documented matches, making it harder to assess his strengths.
- In terms of match experience, Lacides has had more exposure at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, winning 60.00%, compared to Milavsky’s 0% with unspecified activity.
- Lacides has faced opponents with an average ranking of 280.9 in the past year, whereas Milavsky has not played against any ranked players.
- Both players have not won any deciding sets in the past 12 months, which could make the outcome unpredictable if the match goes the distance.
- Event-specific performance can also influence outcomes, though data for the current event isn't provided; however, past performance clearly favors Lacides.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Oscar Lacides displays significantly stronger statistics in recent form compared to Daniel Milavsky. His ability to secure points both on his own second serve and during return games suggests a decisive edge over his opponent.
While Milavsky has not demonstrated comparable skills in serving or returning, Lacides' consistent performances under pressure, such as breakpoint saves, further support his likelihood of winning.
The lack of match victories and notable opponents for Milavsky, combined with Lacides' experience and track record, heavily sway the prediction in favor of Lacides.
Considering these factors, Oscar Lacides is the anticipated winner for this upcoming match against Daniel Milavsky.
Oscar Lacides vs Daniel Milavsky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Lacides vs D. Milavsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:7:20 | Average Match Time | 2:7:20 |
| 53% (40/75) | 1st Serve % | 52% (39/75) |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (24/39) |
| 57% (20/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (17/36) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 45% (34/75) | Return Points Win % | 37% (28/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
O. Lacides Recent Matches Played
D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played

O. Lacides vs D. Milavsky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.79% (40/33) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.28% (57/29) |
| 54.94% (89/73) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.07% (126/77) |
| 51.93% (833/771) | Games Win/Loss | 54.89% (1071/880) |
| 53.13% (17/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.13% (41/21) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 76.47% (13/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 143 | Aces Total | 360 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 176 | Total Double Faults | 272 |
| 1:5:31 | Average Match Time | 1:31:47 |
| 349.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 362.31 |
| 57% (1798/3133) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3058/5074) |
| 68% (1215/1798) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (2191/3058) |
| 49% (658/1335) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1039/2016) |
| 42% (147/349) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (214/507) |
| 42% (1374/3297) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2026/5067) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 54.79% (40/33) | Futures W/L | 71.21% (47/19) |
| 55% (40/73) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (54/83) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (6/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (9/25) |
| 44% (7/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 90% (40/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (53/47) |
| 10% (40/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (53/5) |
| 12% (33/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (33/9) |