Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gonzalez vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gonzalez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 48.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gonzalez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 53.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gonzalez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 57.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gonzalez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Michalski winning 61.54% (W/L 40/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gonzalez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 291/ 133), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 174/ 90), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gonzalez winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Gonzalez winning 4 and Michalski winning 2. The last match between Gonzalez and Michalski was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 25-10-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Pablo Vivero Gonzalez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gonzalez and Michalski have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gonzalez winning 2 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gonzalez winning 1, and Michalski 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gonzalez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 259.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gonzalez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gonzalez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 40.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gonzalez 2 - 0 Michalski
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
Ret.
Rank
283
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
302
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
65% (309-164)
Career Total W/L
62% (207-126)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
Games Won | 31 | 22 |
Aces (Total) | 13 | 11 |
DFs (Total) | 9 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:13:0 | 2:13:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (118/194) | 62% (114/184) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (84/118) | 61% (69/114) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (33/76) | 46% (32/70) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (10/26) | 29% (6/21) |
Return Points W% | 45% (83/184) | 40% (77/194) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 0-6 6-1 |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Daniel Michalski
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
6-7(7) 7-6(2) 6-0 |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
80 of
125)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
53 of
125)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (15/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (159/181) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
Aces Total | 0 | 19 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 0 | 31 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:48:46 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 354.69 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (738/1155) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (463/738) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (201/417) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (41/98) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (417/1090) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (8/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harry Wendelken
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Reese Stalder
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Rincon
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Lluc Mir Anglada
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dominic Thiem
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jonas Forejtek
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
63%
(
35 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H |
view more