Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gonzalez vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gonzalez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gonzalez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gonzalez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 55.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gonzalez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nijboer winning 61.96% (W/L 57/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gonzalez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 291/ 133), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gonzalez winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gonzalez winning 3 and Nijboer winning 2. The last match between Gonzalez and Nijboer was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 21-02-2020, Quarterfinals, Hard with Pablo Vivero Gonzalez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gonzalez and Nijboer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gonzalez winning 0 times and Nijboer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gonzalez winning 1, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gonzalez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 156.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gonzalez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gonzalez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 46.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gonzalez 1 - 1 Nijboer
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
Ret.
Rank
283
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
484
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
65% (309-164)
Career Total W/L
56% (214-165)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Ryan Nijboer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
Games Won | 25 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 12 | 17 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:30 | 1:47:30 |
1st Serve % | 63% (93/148) | 62% (118/189) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (70/93) | 75% (89/118) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (29/55) | 38% (27/71) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (4/15) | 45% (5/11) |
Return Points W% | 39% (73/189) | 33% (49/148) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-5 |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
61%
(
71 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
13
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
39 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Ryan Nijboer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (29/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (268/234) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.42 |
Aces Total | 0 | 103 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.39 |
DFs Total | 0 | 94 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:55 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 208.91 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (905/1554) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (635/905) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (324/649) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (82/180) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (681/1614) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/23) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 77% (13/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harry Wendelken
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Reese Stalder
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Rincon
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Lluc Mir Anglada
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more