Paolo Dagnino vs Marek Gengel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dagnino vs Gengel analysis and find out who is favored!
Paolo Dagnino vs Marek Gengel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dagnino has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gengel has won 53.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dagnino, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gengel has won 55.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dagnino has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gengel has saved 62.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dagnino has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gengel winning 56.6% (W/L 30/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dagnino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 197/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dagnino winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dagnino winning 2 and Gengel winning 0. The last match between Dagnino and Gengel was at the M25+H Appiano, 05-08-2019, Q3, Clay with Paolo Dagnino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dagnino and Gengel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Dagnino winning 0 times and Gengel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Dagnino winning 0, and Gengel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dagnino has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gengel has played against players with an average rank of 116.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dagnino has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gengel has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dagnino has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gengel has converted 47.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Dagnino 1 - 0 Gengel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
583
Rank
256
High
28
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
38% (47-77)
Career Total W/L
57% (298-227)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
81% (22-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,280
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Paolo Dagnino | Marek Gengel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (30/50) | 64% (28/44) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (21/30) | 50% (14/28) |
2nd Serve Win% | 75% (15/20) | 56% (9/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (1/3) |
Return Points W% | 48% (21/44) | 28% (14/50) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Paolo Dagnino
Player
Marek Gengel
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Paolo Dagnino | Marek Gengel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 81% (22/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 79% (45/12) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (315/205) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 81% (22/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.47 |
Aces Total | 0 | 120 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 50 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 84.52 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 69% (1054/1526) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 74% (776/1054) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 54% (254/471) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (86/176) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (684/1585) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 81% (22/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 85% (22/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 95% (22/21) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 5% (22/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Paolo Dagnino Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yosvani Maturell
Player
Paolo Dagnino
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jordi Munoz-Abreu
Player
Paolo Dagnino
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Paolo Dagnino
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H |
view more
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Karim Ibrahim
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
89)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Marek Gengel
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
21
Total Points Won
17
|
4-2 ret. | H2H |
view more