Patrick Ganet vs Jake Eames Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ganet vs Eames analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Ganet vs Jake Eames Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ganet has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Eames has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ganet, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eames has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ganet has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eames has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ganet has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Eames winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ganet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Eames has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 30/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ganet has played against opponents with an average rank of while Eames has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ganet has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eames has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ganet has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eames has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ganet 0 - 0 Eames
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
41
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
695
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
37% (15-26)
Career Total W/L
44% (45-58)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Patrick Ganet | Jake Eames |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Patrick Ganet Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jake Eames Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Jake Eames
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Jake Eames
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jake Eames
Player
Blake Ellis
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more