Paul Oosterbaan vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Oosterbaan vs Findel-Hawkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Oosterbaan vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oosterbaan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oosterbaan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oosterbaan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oosterbaan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Findel-Hawkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Oosterbaan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 27/ 15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 30/ 26). Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Oosterbaan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Oosterbaan winning 2 and Findel-Hawkins winning 0. The last match between Oosterbaan and Findel-Hawkins was at the M25 Vero Beach, 01-05-2019, First, Clay with Paul Oosterbaan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Oosterbaan and Findel-Hawkins have played a deciding set 0 times, with Oosterbaan winning 0 times and Findel-Hawkins 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Oosterbaan winning 1, and Findel-Hawkins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oosterbaan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Findel-Hawkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oosterbaan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oosterbaan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Oosterbaan 1 - 0 Findel-Hawkins
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
644
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (60-43)
Career Total W/L
59% (70-49)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Oosterbaan VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Paul Oosterbaan | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (32/54) | 51% (39/77) |
1st Serve Win% | 81% (26/32) | 74% (29/39) |
2nd Serve Win% | 86% (19/22) | 39% (15/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Return Points W% | 43% (33/77) | 17% (9/54) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Oosterbaan VS Findel-Hawkins H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-6(3) |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
53
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Paul Oosterbaan | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Paul Oosterbaan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
John Mcnally
Player
Paul Oosterbaan
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
Maksim Tikhomirov
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Simon Freund
Player
Paul Oosterbaan
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
Cleeve Harper
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
Robby Shymansky
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ronan Jachuck
Player
Paul Oosterbaan
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
Dragos Constantin Ignat
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Paul Oosterbaan
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
George Botezan
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
108)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Oosterbaan
Player
Michael Shabaz
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
48 of
64)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
24 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more