Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Woerner vs Zura Tkemaladze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Woerner vs Tkemaladze analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Woerner vs Zura Tkemaladze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Woerner has won 44.06% of points on his second serve, while Tkemaladze has won 49.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Woerner, in recent form, has won 50.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tkemaladze has won 53.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.55% and 33.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Woerner has saved 60.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tkemaladze has saved 52.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Woerner has won 41.3% of matches played (W/L 19/ 27), with Tkemaladze winning 49.21% (W/L 31/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Woerner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 235/ 173), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17). Tkemaladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 72/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Woerner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.3% of matches (W/L 19/ 27), where as Tkemaladze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 30/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Woerner winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Woerner winning 2 and Tkemaladze winning 1. The last match between Woerner and Tkemaladze was at the M25 Marburg, 05-07-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Paul Woerner getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Woerner and Tkemaladze have played a deciding set 1 times, with Woerner winning 1 times and Tkemaladze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Woerner winning 0, and Tkemaladze 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Woerner has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.07 while Tkemaladze has played against players with an average rank of 114.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Woerner has won 89% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tkemaladze has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Woerner has converted 42.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tkemaladze has converted 38.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Woerner 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
900
Rank
644
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
731
Rank
633
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
54% (289-244)
Career Total W/L
47% (102-117)
53% (8-7)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Woerner VS Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Paul Woerner | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (53/83) | 63% (46/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 47% (25/53) | 48% (22/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (15/30) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (41/73) | 52% (43/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Woerner VS Tkemaladze H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-7 10-7 |
Stats 
Paul Woerner
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
52%
(
43 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Woerner | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (8/7) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (16/17) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (163/159) | 44% (158/200) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 50% (7/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:52 | 1:41:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 111.6 | 89.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (586/921) | 68% (711/1041) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (380/586) | 59% (419/711) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (149/335) | 47% (156/330) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (32/85) | 39% (45/116) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (350/859) | 40% (410/1029) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (8/7) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (8/15) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (9/0) |
Paul Woerner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Paul Woerner
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ha Minh Duc Vu
Player
Paul Woerner
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Boris Pokotilov
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Aaron Cohen
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Paul Woerner
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Anapat Timangkul
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Paul Woerner
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Berk Ilkel
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Seydina Andre
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Aurel Ciocanu
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
25 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Woerner Vs Tkemaladze Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
