Paula Badosa Gibert vs Naomi Osaka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 May at 12:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Badosa Gibert vs N. Osaka

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gibert 1 - 0 Osaka
They have played 3 sets in total, with Paula Badosa Gibert winning 2 and Naomi Osaka winning 1. The last match between Paula Badosa Gibert and Naomi Osaka was at the French Open - Paris, 26-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 6-7(1) 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gibert | 1 |
| Osaka | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) French Open - Paris(05-26-25)
P. B. Gibert vs N. Osaka H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $8,016,693 | Career Prize Money | $24,149,734 |
| 64.31% (391-217) | Career Total W/L | 64.46% (341-188) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 58.06% (18-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.67% (30-15) |
P. B. Gibert vs N. Osaka Match Preview:
- Could Osaka's slightly better second serve win rate of 45.94% give her an advantage? It seems probable, as Gibert's rate is 42.63%.
- In terms of returning second serves, Osaka edges out with a 50.28% success rate over Gibert's 48.86%. This suggests a minor upper hand for Osaka in return games.
- How does each player's performance under pressure influence the match? Gibert has a slight advantage, saving 53.44% of breakpoints compared to Osaka's 52.36%.
- In the past year, Gibert's match win rate of 70.69% surpasses Osaka's 63.41%, indicating a stronger overall performance.
- Do surface preferences matter? Osaka excels on Hard courts with a 66% win rate, whereas Gibert shines on Clay with 65%.
- Considering the competition level, Osaka has faced opponents ranked at an average of 76.56, while Gibert's opponents had an average rank of 49.78, suggesting Gibert has competed against stronger players.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Osaka shows stronger resolve, winning 60% compared to Gibert's 57% win rate.
- Break point conversion rates are closely matched; Gibert converts slightly more at 33.55% against Osaka's 32.28%.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the players' recent performance stats, Osaka has a minor advantage in both second serve points and returning second serves, which could play a crucial role in this match.
However, Gibert has been playing against stronger opponents and has a higher overall match win rate over the past year, which cannot be overlooked.
The match could be closely contested, with both players having demonstrated strong performances under pressure, though Gibert has a slight edge in breakpoint conversion.
Given these factors, while Osaka's strengths on second serves and returning could tip the scales in her favor, Gibert's overall form and experience against tougher opponents make her the likely favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Naomi Osaka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. B. Gibert vs N. Osaka H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:21:0 | Average Match Time | 2:21:0 |
| 61% (62/101) | 1st Serve % | 61% (59/97) |
| 71% (44/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (40/59) |
| 59% (23/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 43% (42/97) | Return Points Win % | 34% (34/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. B. Gibert Recent Matches Played
N. Osaka Recent Matches Played

P. B. Gibert vs N. Osaka Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.31% (391/217) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.46% (341/188) |
| 61.53% (851/532) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.06% (740/472) |
| 54.54% (6923/5771) | Games Win/Loss | 54.72% (6143/5084) |
| 64.82% (164/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.95% (233/115) |
| 65.13% (170/91) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (66/44) |
| 62.50% (35/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (18/9) |
| 57.89% (22/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 54.55% (24/20) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1734 | Aces Total | 2348 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2158 | Total Double Faults | 998 |
| 1:18:45 | Average Match Time | 1:9:32 |
| 400.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.31 |
| 60% (20753/34486) | 1st Serve % | 56% (15317/27213) |
| 67% (13879/20753) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (10996/15317) |
| 46% (6333/13719) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5753/11895) |
| 46% (1987/4302) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1395/3045) |
| 45% (15628/34757) | Return Points Win % | 43% (11585/27178) |
| 64.94% (50/27) | Slam W/L | 72.28% (73/28) |
| 59.41% (60/41) | Masters W/L | 62.76% (91/54) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 75.00% (6/2) |
| 61.11% (88/56) | Main Tour W/L | 59.29% (83/57) |
| 67.95% (159/75) | Challenger W/L | 65.79% (75/39) |
| 68.75% (33/15) | Futures W/L | 61.90% (13/8) |
| 67% (386/577) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (338/517) |
| 10% (1/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 61% (87/142) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (65/122) |
| 64% (115/181) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (104/162) |
| 88% (378/332) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (319/287) |
| 11% (378/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (319/31) |
| 25% (229/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (210/55) |