Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pedro Iamachkine vs Dario Huber Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Iamachkine vs Huber analysis and find out who is favored!
Pedro Iamachkine vs Dario Huber Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Iamachkine has won 42.32% of points on his second serve, while Huber has won 50.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Iamachkine, in recent form, has won 53.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Huber has won 58.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.12% and 32.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Iamachkine has saved 47.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Huber has saved 57.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Iamachkine has won 56% of matches played (W/L 28/ 22), with Huber winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Iamachkine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 25/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 79/ 70). Huber has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Iamachkine has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20), where as Huber has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Iamachkine winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Iamachkine winning 2 and Huber winning 1. The last match between Iamachkine and Huber was at the M25 Muttenz, 15-08-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Pedro Iamachkine getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Iamachkine and Huber have played a deciding set 1 times, with Iamachkine winning 1 times and Huber 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Iamachkine winning 0, and Huber 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Iamachkine has played against opponents with an average rank of 77.18 while Huber has played against players with an average rank of 19.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Iamachkine has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Huber has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Iamachkine has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Huber has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Iamachkine 1 - 0 Huber
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
54% (104-87)
Career Total W/L
40% (24-36)
44% (4-5)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Iamachkine VS Huber H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Pedro Iamachkine | Dario Huber |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 20 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:0 | 2:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (54/74) | 59% (43/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 50% (27/54) | 63% (27/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (14/20) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (34/73) | 45% (33/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Iamachkine VS Huber H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 10-7 |
Stats 
Pedro Iamachkine
Player
Dario Huber
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pedro Iamachkine | Dario Huber |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (4/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (9/11) | 58% (14/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (88/100) | 51% (126/120) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.08 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:23 | 1:5:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 20 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (228/360) | 50% (226/449) |
| 1st Serve W% | 53% (121/228) | 74% (167/226) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (50/132) | 51% (113/223) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (13/33) | 50% (25/50) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (129/324) | 43% (201/468) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (4/4) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 63% (8/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Pedro Iamachkine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ezequiel Simonit
Player
Pedro Iamachkine
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Pedro Iamachkine
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Gimenez
Player
Pedro Iamachkine
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Pedro Iamachkine
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Iamachkine
Player
Tobias Franco
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
79%
(
61 of
77)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Iamachkine
Player
Ignacio Novo
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(8) 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 0-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pedro Iamachkine
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dario Huber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alexandru Cristian Dumitru
Player
Dario Huber
42%
(
27 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dario Huber
Player
Kanan Gasimov
47%
(
36 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dario Huber
Player
Adam Panaras
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dario Huber
Player
Arthur Colson
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Berger
Player
Dario Huber
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dario Huber
Player
Erwin Troebinger
42%
(
25 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(3) 7-5 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Iamachkine Vs Huber Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
