Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pedro Sakamoto vs Edan Leshem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sakamoto vs Leshem analysis and find out who is favored!
Pedro Sakamoto vs Edan Leshem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sakamoto has won 50.13% of points on his second serve, while Leshem has won 38.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sakamoto, in recent form, has won 54.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Leshem has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.12% and 34.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sakamoto has saved 59.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leshem has saved 46.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sakamoto has won 60.53% of matches played (W/L 46/ 30), with Leshem winning 44.44% (W/L 8/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sakamoto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 369/ 268), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 31/ 34). Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 162), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Sakamoto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 24), where as Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sakamoto winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sakamoto winning 3 and Leshem winning 2. The last match between Sakamoto and Leshem was at the M25 Rancho Santa Fe, 15-01-2020, First, Hard with Pedro Sakamoto getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sakamoto and Leshem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sakamoto winning 0 times and Leshem 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sakamoto winning 0, and Leshem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sakamoto has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.21 while Leshem has played against players with an average rank of 202.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sakamoto has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leshem has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sakamoto has converted 50.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leshem has converted 48.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sakamoto 1 - 1 Leshem
305
Rank
284
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
866
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (402-304)
Career Total W/L
58% (308-220)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$20,740
Career Prize Money
$26,870
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pedro Sakamoto | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:8 | 1:59:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (114/175) | 57% (94/164) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (77/114) | 71% (67/94) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (30/61) | 49% (34/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (63/164) | 39% (68/175) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Edan Leshem
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
110)
12
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pedro Sakamoto | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) | 25% (2/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (211/189) | 45% (33/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:48 | 1:27:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257 | 119 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (758/1230) | 66% (159/240) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (493/758) | 58% (93/159) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (222/472) | 38% (31/81) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (65/130) | 48% (14/29) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (507/1184) | 42% (93/219) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Pedro Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Fernandez
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
16
Total Points Won
12
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sakamoto Vs Leshem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
