Philip Gubenco vs Erik Graves Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gubenco vs Graves analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Gubenco vs Erik Graves Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gubenco has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Graves has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gubenco, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Graves has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gubenco has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Graves has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gubenco has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Graves winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gubenco has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 36/ 55). Graves has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gubenco has played against opponents with an average rank of while Graves has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gubenco has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Graves has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gubenco has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Graves has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gubenco 0 - 0 Graves
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
42
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
44
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
45% (61-75)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-9)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Philip Gubenco | Erik Graves |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Philip Gubenco Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Philip Gubenco
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(12) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Erik Graves Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Erik Graves
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tim Kopinski
Player
Erik Graves
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Blake Strode
Player
Erik Graves
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Gabriel Townes
Player
Erik Graves
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 0-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more