Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Henning vs Luke Johnson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henning vs Johnson analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Henning vs Luke Johnson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henning has won 58.2% of points on his second serve, while Johnson has won 52.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henning, in recent form, has won 57.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Johnson has won 56.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.29% and 27.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henning has saved 61.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Johnson has saved 41.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henning has won 84.78% of matches played (W/L 39/ 7), with Johnson winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Johnson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 16/ 9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.78% of matches (W/L 39/ 7), where as Johnson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Henning winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Henning winning 2 and Johnson winning 0. The last match between Henning and Johnson was at the M25 Austin, 16-11-2021, First, Hard with Philip Henning getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Henning and Johnson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Henning winning 0 times and Johnson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Henning winning 0, and Johnson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 111.41 while Johnson has played against players with an average rank of 201.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henning has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Johnson has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henning has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Johnson has converted 22.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Henning 1 - 0 Johnson
567
Rank
565
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
896
Rank
606
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
79% (48-13)
Career Total W/L
55% (156-130)
84% (16-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Philip Henning | Luke Johnson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:0 | 1:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (41/61) | 59% (40/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (25/41) | 60% (24/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 39% (11/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (33/68) | 39% (24/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Philip Henning
Player
Luke Johnson
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Henning | Luke Johnson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 84% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 77% (33/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (237/164) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 92% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 94.11 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (863/1233) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (573/863) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (210/370) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (78/161) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (601/1326) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 84% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (16/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 60% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Aleksandre Metreveli
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kokoro Isomura
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
106)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Manuel Mazza
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mikhail Korovin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
85%
(
22 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Bosio
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Vadym Ursu
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Nicolas Jadoun
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Faris Zakaryia
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Johnson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Luke Johnson
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Luke Johnson
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Luke Johnson
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
15
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Mertens
Player
Luke Johnson
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
7
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
112
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Virgile Le Bourjois
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Luke Johnson
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Luke Johnson
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Luke Johnson
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Luke Johnson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
14
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Henning Vs Johnson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
