Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Henning vs Nathan Ponwith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henning vs Ponwith analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Henning vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henning has won 57.36% of points on his second serve, while Ponwith has won 53.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henning, in recent form, has won 59.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 46.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.51% and 28.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henning has saved 62.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 57.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henning has won 85.37% of matches played (W/L 35/ 6), with Ponwith winning 30.61% (W/L 15/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.37% of matches (W/L 35/ 6), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Henning winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Henning winning 2 and Ponwith winning 1. The last match between Henning and Ponwith was at the M25 Austin, 18-11-2021, Second, Hard with Philip Henning getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Henning and Ponwith have played a deciding set 1 times, with Henning winning 1 times and Ponwith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Henning winning 0, and Ponwith 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 102.1 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 196.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henning has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henning has converted 50.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 36.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Henning 1 - 0 Ponwith
568
Rank
565
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
782
Rank
367
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
79% (44-12)
Career Total W/L
56% (166-131)
86% (12-2)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Philip Henning | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:19:0 | 3:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (81/112) | 61% (67/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (53/81) | 60% (40/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 56% (24/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (6/17) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (46/110) | 40% (45/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Philip Henning
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
110)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Henning | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 86% (12/2) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 83% (25/5) | 43% (16/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 63% (175/105) | 48% (171/185) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 92% (12/1) | 50% (7/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 13 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:17 | 1:54:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 60.64 | 279.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (621/870) | 58% (681/1171) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (425/621) | 65% (442/681) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (141/249) | 54% (266/490) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (59/114) | 42% (37/89) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (430/929) | 38% (424/1123) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 86% (12/14) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 22% (9/2) |
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Bosio
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Philip Henning
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Vadym Ursu
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Nicolas Jadoun
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Faris Zakaryia
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
5
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Alexandr Binda
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mees Rottgering
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nathan Ponwith
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
John Echeverria
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Duarte Vale
64%
(
91 of
142)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
65 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
124
Total Points Won
126
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Henning Vs Ponwith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nathan Ponwith
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
