Pia Lovric vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Lovric vs C. Wilda Hennemann

Pia Lovric
 SLO
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
24
-
Height
-
554
C. Rank
479
405
Best Rank
283
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
 SWE
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
24
-
Height
-
554
C. Rank
479
405
Best Rank
283
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Lovric 1 - 0 Hennemann
They have played 3 sets in total, with Pia Lovric winning 2 and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 1. The last match between Pia Lovric and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann was at the W15 Warmbad-Villach, 20-08-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 5-7 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Lovric | 1 | 
| Hennemann | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Warmbad-Villach(08-20-21)
Pia Lovric
5
7
6
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
7
6
3
P. Lovric vs C. W. Hennemann H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 58.52% (182-129) | Career Total W/L | 64.59% (197-108) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 4 | Titles | 9 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
P. Lovric vs C. W. Hennemann Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pia Lovric has won 36.91% of points on their second serve, while Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 35.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pia Lovric, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 53.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.99% and 42.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pia Lovric has saved 45.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has saved 46.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pia Lovric has won 60.00% of matches played (W/L 36/24), with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 82.35% (W/L 28/6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pia Lovric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 171/112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 11% (W/L 1/8). Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 28/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Pia Lovric has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/17), where as Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.00% of matches (W/L 19/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pia Lovric winning 1 times and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pia Lovric winning 2 and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 1.
- The last match between Pia Lovric and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann was at the W15 Warmbad-Villach, 20-08-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 5-7 7-6(2) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:59:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pia Lovric has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.13 while Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 328.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pia Lovric has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pia Lovric has converted 33.90% of breakpoint opportunities, and Caijsa Wilda Hennemann has converted 45.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Pia Lovric vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Lovric vs C. W. Hennemann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 | 
| 18 | Games Won | 16 | 
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 | 
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 | 
| 2:59:0 | Average Match Time | 2:59:0 | 
| 75% (83/111) | 1st Serve % | 68% (93/137) | 
| 52% (43/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (43/93) | 
| 61% (17/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (24/44) | 
| 42% (8/19) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (8/14) | 
| 51% (70/137) | Return Points Win % | 46% (51/111) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lovric 47%, Hennemann 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lovric 61%, Hennemann 63%.
Break Points Saved %: Lovric 54%, Hennemann 54%.
P. Lovric Recent Matches Played
C. W. Hennemann Recent Matches Played

P. Lovric vs C. W. Hennemann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.52% (182/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.59% (197/108) | 
| 57.64% (396/291) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.42% (425/267) | 
| 53.64% (3302/2854) | Games Win/Loss | 55.03% (3409/2786) | 
| 58.82% (10/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (14/8) | 
| 60.42% (171/112) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.25% (154/82) | 
| 9.09% (1/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.70% (29/18) | 
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 
| 116 | Aces Total | 241 | 
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 
| 607 | Total Double Faults | 499 | 
| 1:29:9 | Average Match Time | 1:33:59 | 
| 457.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 494.47 | 
| 72% (12670/17582) | 1st Serve % | 67% (11907/17794) | 
| 57% (7264/12670) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (6794/11907) | 
| 44% (2149/4912) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2768/5905) | 
| 51% (1281/2507) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1253/2432) | 
| 49% (8821/17966) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8518/17180) | 
| 25.00% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (9/6) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 51.52% (85/80) | Challenger W/L | 56.69% (89/68) | 
| 68.09% (96/45) | Futures W/L | 74.44% (99/34) | 
| 59% (176/297) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (194/302) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 54% (29/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (25/44) | 
| 51% (40/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (50/83) | 
| 88% (183/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (196/173) | 
| 12% (183/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (196/23) | 
| 14% (128/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (109/24) | 
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.53
W2
2.33
11:00 AM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.47
W2
2.48
04:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.375
W2
1.58
12:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.079
W2
6.4
12:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.15
W2
1.62
05:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.15
W2
1.7
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
31 Oct 2025
Himeno Sakatsume vs Maya Joint Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Yulia Putintseva vs Viktorija Golubic Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Sara Bejlek vs Julia Riera Prediction – WTA Cali Open – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Francisco Cerundolo vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Francisco Cerundolo vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 14-7
H2H 5-6
H2H 6-4
21:00
H2H 1-6
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Ibague
Colombia
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Trois-Rivieres
Canada
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Harlingen
United States
M25 Lajeado
Brazil
M25 Sintra
Portugal












