Pol Wattanakul vs Haadin Bava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wattanakul vs Bava analysis and find out who is favored!
Pol Wattanakul vs Haadin Bava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wattanakul has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bava has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wattanakul, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bava has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wattanakul has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bava has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wattanakul has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 14/ 10), with Bava winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wattanakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Bava has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 99/ 65), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Wattanakul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10), where as Bava has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wattanakul winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Wattanakul winning 2 and Bava winning 1. The last match between Wattanakul and Bava was at the M15 Nonthaburi, 03-12-2019, Q3, Hard with Pol Wattanakul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wattanakul and Bava have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wattanakul winning 1 times and Bava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wattanakul winning 0, and Bava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wattanakul has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Bava has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wattanakul has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bava has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wattanakul has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bava has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wattanakul 1 - 0 Bava
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
631
Rank
598
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
842
Rank
668
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
45% (112-139)
Career Total W/L
59% (115-80)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,420
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wattanakul VS Bava H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Pol Wattanakul | Haadin Bava |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:0 | 1:42:0 |
1st Serve % | 51% (39/76) | 66% (40/61) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (26/39) | 65% (26/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (20/37) | 48% (10/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Points W% | 41% (25/61) | 39% (30/76) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Wattanakul VS Bava H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-3 10-6 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Haadin Bava
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pol Wattanakul | Haadin Bava |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Pol Wattanakul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maximus Jones
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Kody Pearson
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Pol Wattanakul
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
2
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
11
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Chukang Wang
Player
Pol Wattanakul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Tao Mu
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Jimmy Yang
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jin
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
He Ziheng
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Haadin Bava Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Akram El Sallaly
Player
Haadin Bava
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Haadin Bava
Player
Lakshit Sood
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Luca Sanchez
Player
Haadin Bava
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Haadin Bava
Player
Finn Bischof
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexis Gautier
Player
Haadin Bava
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Haadin Bava
Player
Ivan Liutarevich
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Haadin Bava
Player
Aleksei Khomich
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
77 of
100)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Haadin Bava
Player
Tarun Chilakalapudi
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Haadin Bava
Player
Arjun Mahadevan
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more