Polina Leykina vs Jing-Jing Lu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Oct at 10:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Leykina vs J. Lu

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Leykina 1 - 0 Lu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Polina Leykina winning 2 and Jing-Jing Lu winning 0. The last match between Polina Leykina and Jing-Jing Lu was at the W35 Huzhou, 13-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Polina Leykina getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leykina | 1 |
| Lu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Huzhou(10-13-25)
P. Leykina vs J. Lu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $11,680 | Career Prize Money | $63,251 |
| 58.07% (428-309) | Career Total W/L | 54.67% (310-257) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Leykina vs J. Lu Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Jing-Jing Lu has secured 33.67% of second serve points, while Polina Leykina has achieved 41.50%. Does Leykina's better performance give her an advantage? Likely, yes.
- Return Game Stats: Jing-Jing Lu has won 52.01% of opponents' second serve points in recent form compared to Leykina's 56.90%. Who has the superior return? Leykina slightly edges out in this area.
- Under Pressure: Lu has saved 44.97% of breakpoints recently, whereas Leykina has saved 46.41%. Which player handles pressure better? The stats suggest Leykina might have the upper hand.
- Overall Performance: Jing-Jing Lu has a 50% match win rate over the last year, compared to Leykina's 61.70%. Judging by these figures, Leykina appears to have a stronger performance record.
- Favorite Surface: Lu excels on grass with a 57% win rate, but struggles on clay with 51%. Leykina, conversely, performs best on hard surfaces with a 57% success rate, but has no victories on grass.
- Competition Level: Lu has competed mainly in $10K tournaments, winning 52.38% of games, whereas Leykina has achieved a higher win rate of 65.52% at the same level. Does this suggest Leykina is better suited to win? Yes, it does.
- Opponent Quality: In the last year, Lu's opponents had an average rank of 499.28, whereas Leykina's faced competition with an average rank of 72.23. Is facing tougher opponents indicative of Leykina's strength? Clearly, yes.
- Deciding Set Record: Lu has won 27% of deciding sets, while Leykina has won 53% over the past year. If this match reaches a deciding set, who is likely to clinch it? Leykina shows better potential here.
- Current Event Performance: For insights into who is in form, reviewing current event statistics and player performance in this specific event is essential.
Editorial Prediction (October 12, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent trends and statistics, Polina Leykina exhibits superior performance and steadiness, particularly in second serve points and pressure situations.
Her consistent results against tougher opponents and impressive win rates on favored surfaces provide her with a distinct advantage in the upcoming match against Jing-Jing Lu.
With her demonstrated ability to prevail in deciding sets, Leykina stands as the favorite to win this tennis clash.
Polina Leykina vs Jing-Jing Lu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Leykina vs J. Lu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:17:10 | Average Match Time | 1:17:10 |
| 69% (37/54) | 1st Serve % | 77% (48/62) |
| 78% (29/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (32/48) |
| 71% (12/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (5/14) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 40% (25/62) | Return Points Win % | 24% (13/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Leykina Recent Matches Played
J. Lu Recent Matches Played

P. Leykina vs J. Lu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.07% (428/309) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.67% (310/257) |
| 56.46% (961/741) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.47% (694/604) |
| 52.77% (8147/7291) | Games Win/Loss | 51.61% (6151/5767) |
| 65.35% (132/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.78% (246/195) |
| 56.98% (253/191) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.65% (39/38) |
| 48.31% (43/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 371 | Aces Total | 370 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1058 | Total Double Faults | 1352 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 541.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 590.06 |
| 61% (15450/25305) | 1st Serve % | 64% (13342/20786) |
| 57% (8757/15450) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7944/13342) |
| 44% (4324/9855) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (3083/7444) |
| 48% (1667/3444) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1376/2774) |
| 48% (11943/24897) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9891/20693) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (3/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 31.25% (5/11) | Main Tour W/L | 45.28% (24/29) |
| 51.42% (199/188) | Challenger W/L | 57.40% (252/187) |
| 67.67% (224/107) | Futures W/L | 55.10% (27/22) |
| 58% (419/724) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (302/552) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (65/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (49/109) |
| 53% (124/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (97/178) |
| 86% (406/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (290/255) |
| 14% (406/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (290/35) |
| 24% (331/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (276/55) |