Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Quentin Folliot vs Pedro Sakamoto Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Folliot vs Sakamoto analysis and find out who is favored!
Quentin Folliot vs Pedro Sakamoto Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Folliot has won 52.4% of points on his second serve, while Sakamoto has won 50.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Folliot, in recent form, has won 48.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sakamoto has won 55.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.66% and 35.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Folliot has saved 45.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sakamoto has saved 58.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Folliot has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 18/ 16), with Sakamoto winning 60.76% (W/L 48/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Folliot has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 139/ 99), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Sakamoto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 369/ 268), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 31/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Folliot has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/ 16), where as Sakamoto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.9% of matches (W/L 33/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Folliot winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Folliot winning 0 and Sakamoto winning 2. The last match between Folliot and Sakamoto was at the Concepcion Challenger, 20-01-2022, Second, Clay with Pedro Sakamoto getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Folliot and Sakamoto have played a deciding set 0 times, with Folliot winning 0 times and Sakamoto 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Folliot winning 0, and Sakamoto 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Folliot has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.62 while Sakamoto has played against players with an average rank of 286.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Folliot has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sakamoto has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Folliot has converted 41.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sakamoto has converted 50.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Folliot 0 - 1 Sakamoto
848
Rank
488
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
299
Rank
284
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
56% (200-156)
Career Total W/L
57% (402-304)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$20,740
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Quentin Folliot | Pedro Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:47 | 1:36:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (27/52) | 69% (43/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (20/27) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 28% (7/25) | 53% (10/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (26/62) | 48% (25/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Quentin Folliot
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Quentin Folliot | Pedro Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (26/16) | 56% (25/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (194/181) | 53% (211/189) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 55% (11/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 49 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 224.5 | 257 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (625/1062) | 62% (758/1230) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (411/625) | 65% (493/758) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (229/437) | 47% (222/472) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (47/114) | 50% (65/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (439/1124) | 43% (507/1184) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (12/6) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 100% (11/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (11/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 9% (11/1) |
Quentin Folliot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Mateus Alves
Player
Quentin Folliot
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Jose Pereira
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Enzo Crevelaro
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Quentin Folliot
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Quentin Folliot
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Gabriel Tumasonis
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Quentin Folliot
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
49
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Alessandro Pecci
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
0
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pedro Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Fernandez
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
16
Total Points Won
12
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Folliot Vs Sakamoto Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
