Radu Mihai Papoe vs Berk Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papoe vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Berk Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papoe has won 59.92% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 44.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papoe, in recent form, has won 58.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 55.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.42% and 39.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papoe has saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 53.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papoe has won 76.32% of matches played (W/L 29/ 9), with Ilkel winning 53.19% (W/L 25/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papoe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 23/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 66/ 34). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 21/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 63/ 79).
- Player level: In the last year, Papoe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 28/ 8), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.35% of matches (W/L 25/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papoe winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Papoe winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Papoe and Ilkel was at the M15 Antalya, 07-03-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Radu Mihai Papoe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papoe and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Papoe winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Papoe winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papoe has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.97 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 76.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papoe has won 88% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papoe has converted 47.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 48.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Papoe 1 - 0 Ilkel
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
545
Rank
509
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
68% (94-45)
Career Total W/L
45% (84-103)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
63% (12-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Berk Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-1 10-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Berk Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 63% (12/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 63% (25/15) |
Games Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 58% (198/144) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 8 | 10 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 77.79 |
1st Serve % | 71% (169/239) | 67% (505/754) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (115/169) | 60% (304/505) |
2nd Serve W% | 61% (43/70) | 45% (113/249) |
BPs Won% Total | 62% (13/21) | 49% (42/86) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (104/247) | 44% (333/749) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 63% (12/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 63% (12/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Ozan Baris
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Preston Stearns
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Liam Draxl
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Perry Gregg
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Angel Diaz Jalil
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Berk Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Louroi Martinez
Player
Berk Ilkel
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dinko Dinev
Player
Berk Ilkel
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hien Pham
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Drazen Petrovic
Player
Berk Ilkel
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Farzan Amiri
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Cezar Cretu
Player
Berk Ilkel
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more