Radu Mihai Papoe vs Radu Dimitrie HRISTACHE Zgondea Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papoe vs Zgondea analysis and find out who is favored!
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Radu Dimitrie HRISTACHE Zgondea Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papoe has won 58.11% of points on his second serve, while Zgondea has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papoe, in recent form, has won 59.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zgondea has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.57% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papoe has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zgondea has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papoe has won 76.32% of matches played (W/L 29/ 9), with Zgondea winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papoe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 23/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 66/ 34). Zgondea has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Papoe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 28/ 8), where as Zgondea has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papoe has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.97 while Zgondea has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papoe has won 88% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zgondea has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papoe has converted 49.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zgondea has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Papoe 0 - 0 Zgondea
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Radu Dimitrie HRISTACHE Zgondea |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 8 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 71% (169/239) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 68% (115/169) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 61% (43/70) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 62% (13/21) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 42% (104/247) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Ozan Baris
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Preston Stearns
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Liam Draxl
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Perry Gregg
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Angel Diaz Jalil
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Radu Dimitrie HRISTACHE Zgondea Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H |
view more