Rafael Nadal vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nadal vs Gimeno-Traver analysis and find out who is favored!
Rafael Nadal vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nadal has won 52% of points on his second serve, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nadal, in recent form, has won 53.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nadal has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nadal has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nadal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 90% (W/L 502/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 82/ 38). Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Nadal has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Nadal winning 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Nadal winning 6 and Gimeno-Traver winning 0. The last match between Nadal and Gimeno-Traver was at the Rio Open 500 - Rio de Janeiro, 18-02-2014, First, Clay with Rafael Nadal getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nadal and Gimeno-Traver have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nadal winning 0 times and Gimeno-Traver 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nadal winning 0, and Gimeno-Traver 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nadal has played against opponents with an average rank of 106.2 while Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nadal has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nadal has converted 42.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nadal 3 - 0 Gimeno-Traver
94
Total
36
Mast
2
Chall
22
Slam
33
Main
0
Minor
512
Rank
1
High
37
Age
L
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
24
Total
0
Mast
14
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
82% (1115-238)
Career Total W/L
57% (625-479)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$96,415,145
Career Prize Money
$1,102,200
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nadal VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Rafael Nadal | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
Games Won | 37 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 11 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:48 | 1:23:48 |
1st Serve % | 63% (103/164) | 54% (83/153) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (76/103) | 70% (58/83) |
2nd Serve Win% | 66% (40/61) | 34% (24/70) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (11/21) | 14% (1/7) |
Return Points W% | 46% (71/153) | 29% (48/164) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Nadal VS Gimeno-Traver H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-5 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
6-1 6-4 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
6-1 6-1 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Rafael Nadal | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (59/45) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
Aces Total | 14 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:33 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 106.2 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (222/322) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (164/222) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (52/100) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (14/33) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (125/318) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Rafael Nadal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Rafael Nadal
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jordan Thompson
Player
Rafael Nadal
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Dominic Thiem
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Rafael Nadal
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
78 of
119)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
115)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
124
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Robin |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Rafael Nadal
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Robin |
Cameron Norrie
Player
Rafael Nadal
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Robin |
Rafael Nadal
Player
Casper Ruud
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
16
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
38 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H |
view more