Raphael Baltensperger vs Tennyson Whiting Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baltensperger vs Whiting analysis and find out who is favored!
Raphael Baltensperger vs Tennyson Whiting Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baltensperger has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Whiting has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baltensperger, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Whiting has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baltensperger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Whiting has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baltensperger has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Whiting winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 46/ 48). Whiting has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 19% (W/L 7/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Whiting has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baltensperger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Baltensperger winning 2 and Whiting winning 0. The last match between Baltensperger and Whiting was at the M25 Vale Do Lobo, 25-10-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Raphael Baltensperger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baltensperger and Whiting have played a deciding set 0 times, with Baltensperger winning 0 times and Whiting 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baltensperger winning 0, and Whiting 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baltensperger has played against opponents with an average rank of 124 while Whiting has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baltensperger has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Whiting has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baltensperger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Whiting has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Baltensperger 1 - 0 Whiting
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
900
Rank
676
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (126-103)
Career Total W/L
15% (7-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Baltensperger VS Whiting H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Raphael Baltensperger | Tennyson Whiting |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 1 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Baltensperger VS Whiting H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Raphael Baltensperger | Tennyson Whiting |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quentin Folliot
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
41%
(
38 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Tennyson Whiting Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jack Loge
Player
Tennyson Whiting
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Shaw
Player
Tennyson Whiting
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adrian Andreev
Player
Tennyson Whiting
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Filippo Baldi
Player
Tennyson Whiting
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Taha Baadi
Player
Tennyson Whiting
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more