Raphael Lambling vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lambling vs Makhlouf analysis and find out who is favored!
Raphael Lambling vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lambling has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Makhlouf has won 48.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lambling, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Makhlouf has won 48.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lambling has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Makhlouf has saved 50.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lambling has won 50% of matches played (W/L 7/ 7), with Makhlouf winning 61.29% (W/L 38/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lambling has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 39/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Makhlouf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 61/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 33/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Lambling has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 7/ 7), where as Makhlouf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 38/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lambling winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lambling winning 2 and Makhlouf winning 0. The last match between Lambling and Makhlouf was at the M15 Uriage, 15-07-2019, Q3, Clay with Raphael Lambling getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lambling and Makhlouf have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lambling winning 0 times and Makhlouf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lambling winning 1, and Makhlouf 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lambling has played against opponents with an average rank of 379.43 while Makhlouf has played against players with an average rank of 37.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lambling has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Makhlouf has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lambling has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Makhlouf has converted 45.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lambling 1 - 0 Makhlouf
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
891
Rank
816
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (47-40)
Career Total W/L
51% (100-97)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (18-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Raphael Lambling | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:25:0 | 2:25:0 |
1st Serve % | 84% (58/69) | 55% (60/110) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (39/58) | 63% (38/60) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (5/11) | 42% (21/50) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 21% (5/24) | 44% (4/9) |
Return Points W% | 46% (51/110) | 36% (25/69) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 7-5 |
Raphael Lambling
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
110)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Raphael Lambling | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/13) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (39/28) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (334/303) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/13) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 0 | 19 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.06 |
DFs Total | 0 | 20 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 42.32 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (481/778) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (287/481) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (132/297) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (33/88) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (330/820) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/13) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/31) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (17/17) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (17/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 7% (14/1) |
Raphael Lambling Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Stefano Reitano
Player
Raphael Lambling
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Lambling
Player
Igor Gimenez
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jules Marie
Player
Raphael Lambling
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raphael Lambling
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Raphael Lambling
Player
Duarte Vale
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
1
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Lambling
Player
Fabio Coelho
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Diego Fernandez Flores
Player
Raphael Lambling
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
12
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Raphael Lambling
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Zhu
Player
Raphael Lambling
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
13
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hady Habib
Player
Raphael Lambling
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Andrea Bolla
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Peter Buldorini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luca Giacomini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Igor Kudriashov
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more