Raphael Perot vs Blaise Bicknell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent second serve performance, Raphael Perot and Blaise Bicknell have similar stats, winning 42.36% and 42.96% of points respectively. Who has the edge? It's slightly in Bicknell's favor.
• When it comes to return games, Perot shows greater strength by winning 47.48% of opponents' second serve points compared to Bicknell's 42.01%. Additionally, Perot dominates in first serve returns at 32.05% versus Bicknell’s 27.66%.
• In pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, Bicknell has a slight advantage, saving 53.75% compared to Perot's 50.72%.
• Perot boasts a superior match win percentage over the past year at 75.93% (W/L 41/13), while Bicknell has a win percentage of 56.41% (W/L 22/17).
• On hard surfaces, both players excel, with a 90% win rate, yet Bicknell struggles more on indoor hard courts with a 17% win rate, compared to Perot’s low clay win rate of 57%.
• Both players mainly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF events, with Perot having a slightly higher win rate of 78.85% versus Bicknell's 71.43%.
• Perot has faced slightly tougher competition, playing against opponents with an average ranking of 363.54 compared to Bicknell's 388.44.
• In deciding set scenarios, Perot appears stronger, winning 67% of such sets, while Bicknell only has a 40% success rate.
• Current event performance can also sway predictions and should be considered alongside historical data for deciding outcomes.

Editorial Prediction (October 25, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the tennis match between Raphael Perot and Blaise Bicknell, key statistics indicate subtle but insightful differences between the two players.

Perot has consistently demonstrated stronger return game capabilities, especially against opponents' second serves. He has also faced slightly tougher opponents historically, which may have provided valuable experience in high-pressure situations.

Blaise Bicknell, on the other hand, exhibits resilience under pressure, saving more breakpoints than his opponent. Despite this, his weaker performance in deciding sets and on specific surfaces could pose challenges.

Considering all factors, including performance data across different match situations, surface preferences, and opponent quality, Raphael Perot seems to have a slight edge going into the match.

Thus, Raphael Perot is the more likely candidate to emerge victorious in this encounter.