Raquel Gonzalez Vilar vs Han Shi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Vilar's second serve success is slightly lower, with a win rate of 36.07%, compared to Shi's 38.14%. Does a slight edge in second serve performance tip the scales in Shi's favor?
• When it comes to winning points on opponents' second serves, Vilar leads with 58.81%, surpassing Shi's 54.95%. Could this advantage point towards a stronger return game for Vilar?
• In terms of first serve returns, Vilar again shows superiority, winning 36.8% of points to Shi’s 34.4%. Will this consistent return game give Vilar the upper hand?
• Vilar has a higher rate of saving breakpoints at 55.48%, compared to Shi's 47.04%. Does Vilar's ability to handle pressure situations suggest a resilience advantage?
• Looking at match win percentages over the past year, Vilar holds a minor lead at 57.14% compared to Shi's 53.45%. Will these statistics favor Vilar in their next match?
• On their best surface, both excel on Hard courts, but Shi has a stronger record with 60% wins, whereas Vilar stands at 51%. Does this make Shi more reliable on this surface?
• At the Challenger/ITF tournament level, Shi outperforms Vilar slightly, winning 57.45% of matches, outpacing Vilar's 54.55%. Does this consistent edge make Shi a reliable competitor?
• Vilar faces opponents with an average rank of 421.9, slightly higher compared to Shi's opponents at 413.9. Does the quality of competition affect the outlook for this match?
• If a deciding set occurs, Vilar has a higher success rate, winning 60% compared to Shi’s 53%. Would this make Vilar a strong candidate if the match extends to a final set?
• Vilar has a better breakpoint conversion rate, seizing 46.43% of opportunities, against Shi's 37.43%. Could this stat prove decisive in breaking Shi's serve during critical moments?

Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent performance statistics, both players exhibit notable strengths, particularly in different areas of their game. Shi displays a slightly better performance on second serves, which might give them a marginal advantage in service points.

However, Vilar shines in return games, which can significantly impact the match, especially if Shi's serve falters. Vilar’s composure under pressure, as demonstrated by a higher breakpoint save rate, indicates a potential edge in crucial moments.

While Shi holds a superior record on their best surface and a higher overall win percentage in tournaments, Vilar's ability to convert breakpoints more effectively and win deciding sets suggests robustness in challenging scenarios.

Overall, the match appears to be closely contested. Vilar's superior returning and ability to handle pressure situations position them as the likely winner in this face-off, assuming they maintain their form and capitalize on breakpoint opportunities.