Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Christasha McNeil Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 10:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Mcadoo vs C. McNeil

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mcadoo 1 - 0 McNeil
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rasheeda Mcadoo winning 2 and Christasha McNeil winning 0. The last match between Rasheeda Mcadoo and Christasha McNeil was at the W100 Tyler, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Rasheeda Mcadoo getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcadoo | 1 |
| McNeil | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Tyler(10-22-25)
R. Mcadoo vs C. McNeil H2H Profile
R. Mcadoo vs C. McNeil Match Preview:
- Christasha Mc Neil has a second serve point win rate of 40.33% in the past six months, while Rasheeda Mcadoo's rate is slightly higher at 44.73%. Is this difference significant? It might be, as second serve performance often correlates with match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning games, Christasha Mc Neil wins 44.82% on second serve return points, closely trailing Rasheeda Mcadoo at 45.85%. On first serves, however, Mc Neil leads with 32.56% compared to Mcadoo’s 29.18%.
- Under pressure, Rasheeda Mcadoo saves a notable 55.41% of breakpoints, surpassing Christasha Mc Neil's 45.63%. Could this indicate resilience in critical moments? It certainly suggests Mcadoo handles pressure better.
- Looking at overall match wins over the last year, Mc Neil holds a slightly higher win rate of 58.70%, compared to Mcadoo’s 55.77%.
- Surface preferences show Christasha Mc Neil excels on indoor hard courts with a 77% win rate, whereas Rasheeda Mcadoo shines on clay, also at 77%. Their least favorable surfaces are clay and hard, respectively.
- Both players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K recently. Mc Neil has a lower win rate here (44.00%) compared to Mcadoo (55.77%).
- In terms of opponent quality, Rasheeda Mcadoo faces slightly tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 411.73 compared to Mc Neil’s 462.54.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Mc Neil has a stronger track record, winning 67% of deciding sets, as opposed to Mcadoo's 53%.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Christasha Mc Neil and Rasheeda Mcadoo presents two players with contrasting strengths and weaknesses.
Rasheeda Mcadoo's superior second serve performance and breakpoint saving ability suggest a robust capability under pressure. Meanwhile, Christasha Mc Neil benefits from stronger performance in deciding sets, posing a challenge in tight situations.
The return game will be crucial, with Mc Neil having an edge in returning first serves. Surface preference may also play a role, with neither player’s favored surface involved in this matchup.
Given these dynamics, Rasheeda Mcadoo appears to be the likely winner, largely due to her handling of high-pressure scenarios and a slight edge in competing against stronger opposition.
Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Christasha McNeil Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Mcadoo vs C. McNeil H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:19:25 | Average Match Time | 1:19:25 |
| 62% (38/61) | 1st Serve % | 56% (35/62) |
| 79% (30/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (25/35) |
| 52% (12/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 42% (26/62) | Return Points Win % | 31% (19/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Mcadoo Recent Matches Played
C. McNeil Recent Matches Played

R. Mcadoo vs C. McNeil Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.39% (197/179) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.06% (36/26) |
| 52.45% (450/408) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.56% (80/64) |
| 52.08% (4135/3804) | Games Win/Loss | 51.83% (679/631) |
| 50.64% (79/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.17% (16/13) |
| 54.44% (98/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 50.00% (20/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 76.92% (10/3) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1005 | Aces Total | 107 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 957 | Total Double Faults | 164 |
| 1:24:27 | Average Match Time | 1:27:51 |
| 468.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.26 |
| 55% (10721/19438) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2049/3496) |
| 65% (6978/10721) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1313/2049) |
| 47% (4085/8716) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (682/1447) |
| 47% (991/2100) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (206/410) |
| 44% (8197/18775) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1541/3474) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.25% (174/159) | Challenger W/L | 47.06% (16/18) |
| 53.49% (23/20) | Futures W/L | 74.07% (20/7) |
| 52% (192/369) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (36/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (33/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 46% (51/111) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 82% (207/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (34/30) |
| 17% (207/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (34/4) |
| 16% (169/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (28/6) |