Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ray Ho vs Daniele Capecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ho vs Capecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Ray Ho vs Daniele Capecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ho has won 43.1% of points on his second serve, while Capecchi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ho, in recent form, has won 55.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Capecchi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.55% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ho has saved 55.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Capecchi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ho has won 52.38% of matches played (W/L 22/ 20), with Capecchi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 31/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Capecchi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 66/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Ho has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 18/ 12), where as Capecchi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ho winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ho winning 0 and Capecchi winning 4. The last match between Ho and Capecchi was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 17-02-2022, Second, Hard with Daniele Capecchi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ho and Capecchi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ho winning 0 times and Capecchi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ho winning 0, and Capecchi 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ho has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.36 while Capecchi has played against players with an average rank of 275.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ho has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Capecchi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ho has converted 37.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Capecchi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ho 0 - 2 Capecchi
889
Rank
715
High
24
Age
L
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
760
Rank
473
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
53% (132-116)
Career Total W/L
56% (268-209)
69% (9-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ray Ho | Daniele Capecchi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 18 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (102/133) | 74% (100/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (74/102) | 76% (76/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (10/31) | 63% (22/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (37/135) | 37% (49/133) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Ray Ho
88%
(
53 of
60)
1st Serve %
95%
(
53 of
56)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
100%
(
7 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Ray Ho
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ray Ho | Daniele Capecchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (18/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (149/118) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.06 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 129.46 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (376/545) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (237/376) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (67/169) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (21/56) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (213/528) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ray Ho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Ray Ho
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Sanhui Shin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
83%
(
68 of
82)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryotaro Matsumura
Player
Ray Ho
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
107)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Ray Ho
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniele Capecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Daniele Capecchi
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
83 of
133)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
57 of
83)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
131
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Moundir
Player
Daniele Capecchi
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Daniele Capecchi
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
122)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
51 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
62 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Johannes Haerteis
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Dusan Obradovic
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Bor Artnak
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
43%
(
44 of
102)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
23%
(
6 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Michele Ribecai
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ho Vs Capecchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
