Reese Stalder vs Yankel Zemel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stalder vs Zemel analysis and find out who is favored!
Reese Stalder vs Yankel Zemel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stalder has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zemel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stalder, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zemel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stalder has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zemel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stalder has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zemel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stalder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 70/ 49), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Zemel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 124/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stalder winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stalder winning 2 and Zemel winning 0. The last match between Stalder and Zemel was at the M15 Heraklion, 01-06-2021, Q3, Hard with Reese Stalder getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stalder and Zemel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stalder winning 0 times and Zemel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stalder winning 0, and Zemel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stalder has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zemel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stalder has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zemel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stalder has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zemel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stalder 1 - 0 Zemel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (72-56)
Career Total W/L
53% (129-115)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Reese Stalder | Yankel Zemel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Reese Stalder | Yankel Zemel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Reese Stalder Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Nick Hardt
Player
Reese Stalder
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Reese Stalder
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Reese Stalder
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Yankel Zemel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jacob Brumm
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Jordan Hasson
Player
Yankel Zemel
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yankel Zemel
Player
Niv Zuckerman
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Yankel Zemel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more