Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Reilly Opelka vs Pablo Cuevas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Opelka vs Cuevas analysis and find out who is favored!
Reilly Opelka vs Pablo Cuevas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Opelka has won 43.24% of points on his second serve, while Cuevas has won 15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Opelka, in recent form, has won 46.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cuevas has won 33.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.41% and 16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Opelka has saved 85.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cuevas has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Opelka has won 100% of matches played (W/L 1/ 0), with Cuevas winning 27.27% (W/L 3/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Opelka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 41/ 21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14). Cuevas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 466/ 260), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Opelka has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 100% of matches (W/L 1/ 0), where as Cuevas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Opelka winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Opelka winning 1 and Cuevas winning 4. The last match between Opelka and Cuevas was at the Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva, 18-05-2021, First, Clay with Pablo Cuevas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Opelka and Cuevas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Opelka winning 0 times and Cuevas 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Opelka winning 0, and Cuevas 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Opelka has played against opponents with an average rank of 96 while Cuevas has played against players with an average rank of 299.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Opelka has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cuevas has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Opelka has converted 60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cuevas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Opelka 0 - 2 Cuevas
653
Rank
17
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
833
Rank
19
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (217-165)
Career Total W/L
60% (570-383)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$2,950,195
Career Prize Money
$4,615,038
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Reilly Opelka | Pablo Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 27 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 48 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:33 | 1:51:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (100/166) | 67% (121/180) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (82/100) | 84% (102/121) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (39/66) | 58% (34/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (44/180) | 27% (45/166) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Reilly Opelka
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 5-7 7-6(9) 7-6(2) |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Reilly Opelka
68%
(
79 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
16
Aces
36
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
67 of
79)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
57 of
64)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
26 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
19%
(
19 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Reilly Opelka | Pablo Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 8% (1/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 253 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (30/50) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/30) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 15% (3/20) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 22% (8/37) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Reilly Opelka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Tennys Sandgren
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
23
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Reilly Opelka
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
12
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
91%
(
21 of
23)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
28
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
24 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
93 of
139)
1st Serve %
66%
(
102 of
155)
17
Aces
19
7
Double Faults
1
90%
(
84 of
93)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
81 of
102)
70%
(
32 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
17%
(
23 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
41 of
155)
157
Total Points Won
137
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(7) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Carlos Taberner
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
115)
21
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
12
86%
(
51 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
51 of
67)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
39 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Reilly Opelka
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Reilly Opelka
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Reilly Opelka
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
6
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
15 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Reilly Opelka
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
41 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
10 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Cuevas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Pablo Cuevas
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Pablo Cuevas
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Pablo Cuevas
44%
(
32 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Pablo Cuevas
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Stefano Travaglia
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
111)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Pablo Cuevas
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Egor Gerasimov
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
7
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
58 of
78)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
33 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Pablo Cuevas
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Pablo Cuevas
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Opelka Vs Cuevas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
