Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Riccardo Di Nocera vs Marlon Vankan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nocera vs Vankan analysis and find out who is favored!
Riccardo Di Nocera vs Marlon Vankan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nocera has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vankan has won 44.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nocera, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vankan has won 49.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nocera has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vankan has saved 56.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nocera has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vankan winning 58.73% (W/L 37/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nocera has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 110/ 86), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nocera winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nocera winning 2 and Vankan winning 1. The last match between Nocera and Vankan was at the M15 Antalya, 17-02-2020, Q2 round, Clay with Riccardo Di Nocera getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nocera and Vankan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nocera winning 1 times and Vankan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nocera winning 0, and Vankan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nocera has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vankan has played against players with an average rank of 184.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nocera has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vankan has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nocera has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vankan has converted 39.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nocera 1 - 0 Vankan
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
558
Rank
558
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
49% (41-43)
Career Total W/L
53% (123-109)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Riccardo Di Nocera | Marlon Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-6 10-8 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Riccardo Di Nocera | Marlon Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (19/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (186/212) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:59:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 161.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (880/1320) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (550/880) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (198/440) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (52/133) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (493/1250) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Riccardo Di Nocera Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Federico Marchetti
Player
Riccardo Di Nocera
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Riccardo Di Nocera
Player
Elesey Avtamonov
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Berk Ilkel
Player
Riccardo Di Nocera
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Riccardo Di Nocera
Player
Giulio Colacioppo
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Riccardo Di Nocera
Player
Gianluca Filoramo
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
19 of
44)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matas Vasiliauskas
Player
Riccardo Di Nocera
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
68 of
119)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Orly Iradukunda
Player
Riccardo Di Nocera
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
65
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Marlon Vankan
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Eero Vasa
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Artur Kukasian
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Atakan Karahan
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Lewie Lane
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Marlon Vankan
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Atakan Karahan
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Marlon Vankan
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Louroi Martinez
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Nocera Vs Vankan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
