Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Richard Gabb vs Kamil Gajewski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gabb vs Gajewski analysis and find out who is favored!
Richard Gabb vs Kamil Gajewski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabb has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gajewski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabb, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gajewski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabb has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gajewski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabb has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gajewski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 144/ 101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Gajewski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 28/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gabb winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gabb winning 2 and Gajewski winning 1. The last match between Gabb and Gajewski was at the Poland F6 (Mragowo), 18-07-2017, First, Clay with Richard Gabb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gabb and Gajewski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gabb winning 1 times and Gajewski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gabb winning 0, and Gajewski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabb has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gajewski has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabb has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gajewski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabb has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gajewski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gabb 1 - 0 Gajewski
Ret.
Rank
410
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
55% (236-195)
Career Total W/L
46% (53-62)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$710
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Richard Gabb | Kamil Gajewski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 12 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (54/88) | 45% (38/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (31/54) | 66% (25/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (20/34) | 51% (24/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (36/85) | 42% (37/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 0-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Richard Gabb
Player
Kamil Gajewski
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
85)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Richard Gabb | Kamil Gajewski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Richard Gabb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Richard Gabb
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
52
Total Points Won
47
|
4-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Ortega-Olmedo
Player
Richard Gabb
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
Player
Richard Gabb
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Karl Friberg
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Jules Okala
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Richard Gabb
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Jordan Hasson
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Richard Gabb
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Smilansky
Player
Richard Gabb
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
18 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamil Gajewski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-7(4) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Gabb Vs Gajewski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
