Roberto Cid Subervi vs Facundo Mena Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Mena analysis and find out who is favored!
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Facundo Mena Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 50.93% of points on his second serve, while Mena has won 52.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 58.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mena has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.4% and 38.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 55.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mena has saved 62.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 71.23% of matches played (W/L 52/ 21), with Mena winning 67.65% (W/L 46/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 118/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.67% of matches (W/L 46/ 14), where as Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 30/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Subervi winning 2 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Subervi winning 6 and Mena winning 6. The last match between Subervi and Mena was at the M15 Santo Domingo, 19-11-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Facundo Mena getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Mena have played a deciding set 2 times, with Subervi winning 0 times and Mena 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 1, and Mena 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.58 while Mena has played against players with an average rank of 290.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mena has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 46.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mena has converted 48.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Subervi 2 - 3 Mena
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
396
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total3
1
Hard2
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
401
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
57% (276-205)
Career Total W/L
57% (458-351)
70% (19-8)
YTD W/L
64% (16-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$140,110
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Facundo Mena |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
Sets Won | 6 | 6 |
Games Won | 60 | 56 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1:11:32 | 1:11:32 |
1st Serve % | 58% (129/221) | 56% (132/234) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (89/129) | 67% (89/132) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (50/92) | 46% (47/102) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (12/28) | 45% (9/20) |
Return Points W% | 42% (98/234) | 37% (82/221) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-1 | |||||
1-6 6-4 10-4 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
67 of
122)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
6-1 6-2 | |||||
6-2 6-2 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Facundo Mena
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Facundo Mena |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 70% (19/8) | 64% (16/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (40/23) | 64% (34/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (319/240) | 57% (264/196) |
Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 75% (3/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 62% (13/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.42 |
Aces Total | 30 | 93 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 65 | 56 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:2 | 1:31:1 |
Avg Opp Rank | 262.19 | 374.72 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1205/1743) | 56% (742/1331) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (806/1205) | 73% (544/742) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (269/538) | 52% (306/589) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (109/228) | 52% (82/157) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (820/1800) | 44% (648/1467) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 55% (6/5) |
Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 71% (10/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 64% (16/25) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 38% (3/8) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 94% (16/15) |
1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 6% (16/1) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Stefan Kozlov
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aidan Mayo
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Bertran
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Kousuke Ogura
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Facundo Mena
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Skander Mansouri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Arjun Kadhe
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Facundo Mena
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
51)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matias Soto
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Alafia Ayeni
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nick Hardt
Player
Facundo Mena
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more