Robin Stanek vs Tim VAN DER Horst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stanek vs Horst analysis and find out who is favored!
Robin Stanek vs Tim VAN DER Horst Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stanek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Horst has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stanek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Horst has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stanek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Horst has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stanek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Horst winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stanek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 79/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 111/ 111). Horst has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stanek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Horst has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stanek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Horst has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stanek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Horst has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stanek 0 - 0 Horst
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Robin Stanek | Tim VAN DER Horst |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Robin Stanek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Robin Stanek
72%
(
87 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Milan Welte
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Jan Satral
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
42
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
SF |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Robin Stanek
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
81%
(
13 of
16)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Stanek
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Kaichi Uchida
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Matyas Cerny
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefan Palosi
Player
Robin Stanek
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
84%
(
58 of
69)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomas Liska
Player
Robin Stanek
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Tim VAN DER Horst Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Niklas Schell
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Ingo Herzgerodt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dominik Boehler
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Romain Gales
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more