Roland Stuurman vs Gian Matias DI Natale Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stuurman vs Natale analysis and find out who is favored!
Roland Stuurman vs Gian Matias DI Natale Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stuurman has won 45.79% of points on his second serve, while Natale has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stuurman, in recent form, has won 52.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Natale has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.36% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stuurman has saved 46.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natale has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stuurman has won 60% of matches played (W/L 30/ 20), with Natale winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stuurman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 45/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 52/ 54). Natale has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Stuurman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20), where as Natale has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stuurman has played against opponents with an average rank of 50.6 while Natale has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stuurman has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natale has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stuurman has converted 40.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natale has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stuurman 0 - 0 Natale
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Roland Stuurman | Gian Matias DI Natale |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (12/7) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (25/21) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (247/220) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.03 | N/A |
Aces Total | 7 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.16 | N/A |
DFs Total | 36 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 38.53 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 67% (357/534) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 60% (215/357) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (79/177) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (24/54) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 41% (228/552) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 63% (12/7) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | N/A |
Roland Stuurman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Tauheed Browning
Player
Roland Stuurman
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Romain Faucon
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Milos Karol
Player
Roland Stuurman
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Sebastian Sorger
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Mousa Alkotop
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Gian Matias DI Natale Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Karlo Cubelic
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maurus Malgiaritta
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Campana
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
S Mert Ozdemir
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
61
|
1-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Tim Handel
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H |
view more