Romina Ccuno vs Maria Kononova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Which player has been mastering their second serve lately? If we dive into their recent form over the past six months, you'll notice that Kononova secures 36.52% of points on their second serve, slightly trailing behind Ccuno, who edges ahead with 38.16%. This figure plays a crucial role in predicting match outcomes, so who truly has the upper hand when it comes to second serve efficiency?

Turning our attention to return games, the stats are telling. Kononova dominates by winning 53.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ccuno closely follows with 52.27%. Interestingly, when it comes to first serve returns, Kononova also leads with 34.88%, compared to Ccuno's 33%. These numbers hold significant weight in head-to-head analysis, aiding us in determining who might have that advantageous edge.

Who steps up under pressure? Kononova saves 44.44% of break points, showcasing resilience, whereas Ccuno isn't far behind with a save rate of 42.94%. Such insights become invaluable during in-game betting. Let’s delve into their successful matches over the past year: Kononova has a modest win rate of 36.11% (W/L 13/23), while Ccuno sports a stronger 46.94% win rate (W/L 23/26), positioning Ccuno as a potential favorite in this matchup.

Could the surface influence the match outcome? On clay, Kononova achieves a win percentage of 48%, but on hard surfaces, this drops to 42%. Ccuno is more adept on clay as well, boasting a 53% win rate. However, their hard court record plummets to just 17%. The surface could be a game-changer here.

In terms of tournament levels, both players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF events over $10K, with Kononova winning 38.24% and Ccuno at 43.33%. This context is essential for understanding their performance relative to the competition they face.

In direct encounters, Ccuno leads with 1 win out of 1 match against Kononova, defeating them in two straight sets. Their last clash at W 50 Vacaria marked a 6-3, 7-6(5) victory for Ccuno. Over their head-to-head history, matches have averaged 1:33:13, providing a glimpse into their competitive dynamic.

Even though neither player has faced each other in a deciding set, generally speaking, Kononova wins 60% of such scenarios, while Ccuno registers 64%. Pressure situations, including tiebreaks, have seen Ccuno come out on top as well.

Considering opponent quality, Kononova’s opponents have an average rank of 340.72, tougher than Ccuno’s at 402.29. Lastly, let's talk about converting breakpoints: Kononova shines by converting 39.82% of opportunities, whereas Ccuno captures 34.45%, further enhancing their prospects during critical match moments.

So, predicting the winner based on these extensive stats? While both players have their strengths, Ccuno's overall performance and record in critical moments suggest they might hold a slight advantage going into this match.