Roy Hobbs vs Daniel Kossek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hobbs vs Kossek analysis and find out who is favored!
Roy Hobbs vs Daniel Kossek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hobbs has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kossek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hobbs, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kossek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hobbs has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kossek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hobbs has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Kossek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hobbs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 69/ 125). Kossek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 27/ 67), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 11% (W/L 4/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Hobbs has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Kossek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hobbs winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hobbs winning 2 and Kossek winning 1. The last match between Hobbs and Kossek was at the Indonesia F1 (Jakarta), 21-07-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Roy Hobbs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hobbs and Kossek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hobbs winning 1 times and Kossek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hobbs winning 0, and Kossek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hobbs has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Kossek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hobbs has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kossek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hobbs has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kossek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hobbs 1 - 0 Kossek
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
36% (76-133)
Career Total W/L
23% (31-101)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Roy Hobbs | Daniel Kossek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Roy Hobbs | Daniel Kossek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Roy Hobbs Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Roy Hobbs
100%
(
93 of
93)
1st Serve %
100%
(
83 of
83)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Roy Hobbs
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tommy Czaplinski
Player
Roy Hobbs
44%
(
31 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roy Hobbs
Player
Blake Bayldon
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Minhtuan Pham
Player
Roy Hobbs
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roy Hobbs
Player
Muhammad Hidayatul Rezky Djufri
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Issei Okamura
Player
Roy Hobbs
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anapat Timangkul
Player
Roy Hobbs
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
14 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Kossek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Daniel Kossek
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
5)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
1
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kapeesh Khandge
Player
Daniel Kossek
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
53%
(
40 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf
Player
Daniel Kossek
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
47%
(
16 of
34)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 1-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more