Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Azorin analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 48.87% of points on his second serve, while Azorin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Azorin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 56.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Azorin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 62.64% of matches played (W/L 57/ 34), with Azorin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Azorin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 158/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 173/ 159).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Azorin has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Azorin winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Azorin was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 27-10-2020, Q3, Hard with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Azorin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Azorin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Azorin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 156 while Azorin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Azorin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 46.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Azorin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Azorin
484
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
834
Rank
442
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (214-164)
Career Total W/L
56% (335-268)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (44/64) | 76% (44/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (32/44) | 66% (29/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 50% (7/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (22/58) | 31% (20/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (29/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (263/222) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 103 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 91 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.32 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (864/1496) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (612/864) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (317/632) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (81/178) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (665/1563) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olivier Rojas
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Vito Tonejc
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
77%
(
78 of
101)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
86%
(
61 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Vladislav Ivanov
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Niccolo Catini
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve %
95%
(
20 of
21)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
35
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonio Massara
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Berk Ilkel
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nijboer Vs Azorin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
