Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Tim VAN DER Horst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Horst analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Tim VAN DER Horst Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.2% of points on his second serve, while Horst has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 54.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Horst has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 56.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Horst has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 64.13% of matches played (W/L 59/ 33), with Horst winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Horst has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Horst has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.42 while Horst has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Horst has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 46.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Horst has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 0 Horst
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Tim VAN DER Horst |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (308/256) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 109 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 101 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218.73 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1030/1739) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (729/1030) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (358/709) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (93/205) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (758/1802) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 1st Match |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Passaro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim VAN DER Horst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Ingo Herzgerodt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Boehler
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Romain Gales
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nijboer Vs Horst Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
