Ryan Nijboer vs Vitali Chvets Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Chvets analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Vitali Chvets Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.22% of points on his second serve, while Chvets has won 51.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chvets has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.3% and 37.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 55.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chvets has saved 65.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 56/ 34), with Chvets winning 46.88% (W/L 15/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Chvets has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 42/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.11% of matches (W/L 51/ 25), where as Chvets has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Chvets winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Chvets was at the M15 Madrid, 07-09-2022, First, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Chvets have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Chvets 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Chvets 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.88 while Chvets has played against players with an average rank of 8.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chvets has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 45.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chvets has converted 52.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Chvets
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (211-162)
Career Total W/L
44% (68-87)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Vitali Chvets |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (33/47) | 63% (31/49) |
1st Serve Win% | 79% (26/33) | 55% (17/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 64% (9/14) | 22% (4/18) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 57% (28/49) | 26% (12/47) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Vitali Chvets
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Vitali Chvets |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 50% (2/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) | 50% (5/5) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (205/176) | 51% (60/57) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.49 | 0 |
Aces Total | 90 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.02 |
DFs Total | 73 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:24 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 188.18 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (647/1167) | 54% (42/78) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (469/647) | 55% (23/42) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (268/520) | 53% (19/36) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (59/132) | 100% (3/3) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (505/1218) | 38% (20/53) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | 50% (2/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 50% (2/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Karl Friberg
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Martin Landaluce
53%
(
60 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Rafael Giotis
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Luka Mikrut
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Vitali Chvets Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
QF |
Chirag Duhan
Player
Vitali Chvets
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more