Ryan Nijboer vs Yuta Shimizu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Shimizu analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Yuta Shimizu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 48.73% of points on his second serve, while Shimizu has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shimizu has won 50.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.38% and 31.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 55.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shimizu has saved 64.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 61.96% of matches played (W/L 57/ 35), with Shimizu winning 50% (W/L 23/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Shimizu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 26/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68% of matches (W/L 51/ 24), where as Shimizu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 22/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 0 and Shimizu winning 2. The last match between Nijboer and Shimizu was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 07-04-2021, First, Hard with Yuta Shimizu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Shimizu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Shimizu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Shimizu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 156.96 while Shimizu has played against players with an average rank of 279.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shimizu has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 46.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shimizu has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 1 Shimizu
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
484
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
274
Rank
203
High
24
Age
L
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Form
56% (214-165)
Career Total W/L
65% (226-122)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$60,235
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Yuta Shimizu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 4 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (31/47) | 58% (30/52) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (18/31) | 83% (25/30) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (6/16) | 59% (13/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 100% (4/4) |
Return Points W% | 27% (14/52) | 49% (23/47) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Ryan Nijboer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Yuta Shimizu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (29/24) | 60% (18/12) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (268/234) | 52% (162/147) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 57% (4/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 57% (4/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.3 |
Aces Total | 103 | 46 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.26 |
DFs Total | 94 | 39 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:55 | 1:31:27 |
Avg Opp Rank | 208.91 | 333.64 |
1st Serve % | 58% (905/1554) | 60% (601/1000) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (635/905) | 70% (422/601) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (324/649) | 54% (215/399) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (82/180) | 43% (36/84) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (681/1614) | 38% (371/967) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 62% (8/5) |
Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 29% (2/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 89% (9/8) |
1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 11% (9/1) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (5/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Yuta Shimizu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mattia Bellucci
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Ergi Kirkin
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Henri Squire
Player
Yuta Shimizu
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
48 of
96)
10
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yuta Shimizu
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Enrico Dalla Valle
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more