Ryan Peniston vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peniston vs analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Peniston vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peniston has won 55.19% of points on his second serve, while has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peniston, in recent form, has won 53.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peniston has saved 53.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peniston has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46). has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peniston has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.69 while has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peniston has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peniston has converted 37.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peniston 0 - 0
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peniston VS H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ryan Peniston | Martin Damm |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (3/6) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (8/11) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (84/92) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.29 | N/A |
Aces Total | 25 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.17 | N/A |
DFs Total | 15 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:9 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 230 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 58% (297/516) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 70% (207/297) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (120/219) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (17/50) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 38% (228/607) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | N/A |
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maxime Cressy
Player
Ryan Peniston
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Duckworth
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
80)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Martin Damm
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
97)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Martin Damm
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H |
view more