Sada Nahimana vs Merel Hoedt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Apr at 09:19 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Nahimana vs M. Hoedt

BDI
2
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nahimana 2 - 0 Hoedt
They have played 4 sets in total, with Sada Nahimana winning 4 and Merel Hoedt winning 0. The last match between Sada Nahimana and Merel Hoedt was at the W50 Bujumbura, 03-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Sada Nahimana getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nahimana | 2 |
Hoedt | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Bujumbura(04-03-25)
(QF) W25 Koksijde(08-13-21)
S. Nahimana vs M. Hoedt H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$6,385 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
60.06% (215-143) | Career Total W/L | 54.40% (198-166) |
2 | Clay | 0 |
5 | Titles | 3 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Nahimana vs M. Hoedt Match Preview:
As we dive into the stats for this thrilling tennis match-up between Hoedt and Nahimana, one pertinent factor is the performance on second serves. Over the past six months, Hoedt has managed to achieve a 38.54% win rate on their second serve points, slightly edging out Nahimana, who stands at 36.8%. Could this slight advantage be the tipping point in determining the winner?
Looking into return game metrics over the last half of a year, Hoedt also takes the lead by winning 55.94% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Nahimana trails with 48.8%. However, when first serve returns are considered, the margin narrows, with Hoedt winning 34.58% compared to Nahimana’s 31.24%. These specific stats not only highlight Hoedt's aggressive return style but also determine the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Nahimana slightly outperforms Hoedt by saving 48.06% of breakpoints, as compared to Hoedt’s 46.04%. When it comes to match wins, Nahimana again leads, securing 65.22% of matchups in the last year compared to Hoedt’s 48.15%. One might wonder if Nahimana's stronger breakpoint conversion and higher match win rate can transform into a definite advantage.
Analyzing their preferred surfaces, both players seem to excel on clay courts, with Nahimana boasting a 62% win rate, overshadowing Hoedt’s 56%. Yet, when navigating through surfaces, Nahimana has shown a bit more versatility, grappling with different conditions better than Hoedt has. This raises the question: can Hoedt adapt their game to Nahimana's stronghold on clay courts?
As we look at their past encounters, Nahimana has claimed victory in their only head-to-head match, making it an engaging clash of mind and mettle. This previous win, alongside other statistical advantages, does set Nahimana slightly ahead in this contest. Furthermore, in deciding sets, Nahimana’s 60% win rate reveals a clutch factor that Hoedt’s 29% seems to lack.
In conclusion, while Hoedt might showcase tenacity on returns and a potential edge in second serve performance, Nahimana's overall consistent performance and higher adaptability tip the balance. Based on these statistics, Nahimana appears poised to extend their head-to-head lead, making them the favorite to clinch victory in this engaging matchup.
Sada Nahimana vs Merel Hoedt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Nahimana vs M. Hoedt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
25 | Games Won | 16 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
1:52:28 | Average Match Time | 1:52:28 |
64% (87/135) | 1st Serve % | 66% (96/145) |
64% (56/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (58/96) |
48% (23/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (15/49) |
41% (9/22) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (6/12) |
50% (72/145) | Return Points Win % | 41% (56/135) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Nahimana Recent Matches Played
M. Hoedt Recent Matches Played

S. Nahimana vs M. Hoedt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.06% (215/143) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.40% (198/166) |
58.20% (465/334) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.90% (442/378) |
53.47% (3850/3350) | Games Win/Loss | 52.49% (3847/3482) |
60.00% (42/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.34% (56/51) |
61.60% (162/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.28% (130/101) |
44.00% (11/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.00% (12/13) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
622 | Aces Total | 378 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.56 |
957 | Total Double Faults | 2003 |
1:40:7 | Average Match Time | 1:39:15 |
286.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.91 |
67% (15355/22802) | 1st Serve % | 64% (13983/21766) |
60% (9242/15355) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8375/13983) |
46% (3433/7448) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (3245/7783) |
49% (1485/3027) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1513/3025) |
47% (10822/23002) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10748/22227) |
0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
36.36% (4/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
59.31% (172/118) | Challenger W/L | 52.50% (84/76) |
69.64% (39/17) | Futures W/L | 56.16% (114/89) |
60% (212/355) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (191/355) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
54% (37/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (29/62) |
55% (48/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (47/99) |
90% (211/189) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (200/171) |
10% (211/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (200/26) |
17% (147/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (164/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Nahimana (W75 Bucharest)
Hoedt (W15 Santa Tecla)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
