Sakura Hosogi vs Alana Parnaby Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Hosogi vs A. Parnaby

Sakura Hosogi

JPN

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

286

C. Rank

843

204

Best Rank

428

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Alana Parnaby

AUS

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

286

C. Rank

843

204

Best Rank

428

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hosogi 3 - 1 Parnaby

They have played 8 sets in total, with Sakura Hosogi winning 6 and Alana Parnaby winning 2. The last match between Sakura Hosogi and Alana Parnaby was at the W35 Burnie, 20-02-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Sakura Hosogi getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hosogi	3
Parnaby	1

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) W35 Burnie(02-20-25)

Stats

Sakura Hosogi

Alana Parnaby

(R2) W35 Cairns(10-03-24)

Stats

Alana Parnaby

Sakura Hosogi

(R2) W25 Montemor-O-Novo(05-19-22)

Stats

Sakura Hosogi

Alana Parnaby

S. Hosogi vs A. Parnaby H2H Profile

S. Hosogi	Stats	A. Parnaby
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.73% (250-155)	Career Total W/L	46.73% (186-212)
3	Hard	1
8	Titles	0
3	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Hosogi vs A. Parnaby Match Preview:

Recent performance on second serve: In the past six months, both Parnaby and Hosogi have displayed remarkable proficiency on their second serves. Parnaby has triumphed in 48.67% of points, while Hosogi has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 48.6%. This stat is highly indicative of their match prediction accuracy.

Return game prowess in recent matches: Analyzing their return game statistics, Parnaby has exhibited exceptional form by winning an impressive 60.1% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Hosogi has outperformed Parnaby in this aspect, winning 61.53% of such points. Furthermore, when it comes to first serve returns, Parnaby boasts a success rate of 42.28%, while Hosogi excels with a remarkable 47.61%. These figures significantly contribute to determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.

Analysis under pressure: Assessing their ability to handle pressure, Parnaby has successfully saved 48.45% of breakpoints in recent matches, whereas Hosogi has outperformed with an impressive save rate of 54.63%. This statistic holds great significance in making in-game betting predictions.

Comprehensive performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Parnaby and Hosogi have demonstrated their prowess on the tennis court. Parnaby has emerged victorious in 52.08% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 25 wins and 23 losses. Hosogi, on the other hand, has achieved an even more impressive win rate of 58.46%, with a record of 38 wins and 27 losses. These statistics allow us to draw an all-encompassing prediction for their head-to-head encounter.

Surface suitability: When considering the players' performance on different surfaces, Parnaby excels on indoor hard courts, securing an impressive 75% win rate with a record of 3 wins and 1 loss. Conversely, Parnaby's weakest surface is clay, where they have a win rate of only 45% with a record of 38 wins and 46 losses. Hosogi's strongest surface is hard, with a win rate of 64% and a record of 187 wins and 106 losses. Similarly to Parnaby, Hosogi struggles more on clay courts, achieving a win rate of 50% with a record of 11 wins and 11 losses.

Player level analysis: Considering the level at which they compete, Parnaby and Hosogi have participated in most of their matches in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Parnaby has secured victory in 51.22% of matches played at this level, with a win-loss record of 21 wins and 20 losses. On the other hand, Hosogi has achieved a win rate of 48%, with a record of 24 wins and 26 losses. Assessing these statistics relative to their respective event levels is crucial in predicting the favorite player.

Past head-to-head matches: Parnaby and Hosogi have clashed three times in the past, with Parnaby emerging victorious once and Hosogi triumphant twice. Throughout these matches, they have played a total of six sets, with Parnaby winning two sets and Hosogi winning four. In their most recent encounter, which took place on the second day of the W35 Cairns tournament on October 3, 2024, Parnaby emerged triumphant with a score of 6-4, 6-3 on a hard court.

Duration of head-to-head matches: In their previous encounters, the average duration of matches between Parnaby and Hosogi has been 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 20 seconds, indicating the intensity and competitiveness of their battles.

Prediction for deciding sets: Thus far, Parnaby and Hosogi have not engaged in any deciding sets against each other. Therefore, predicting the outcome in the event that this match requires a deciding set remains uncertain.

Extreme pressure situations in head-to-head: Out of the matches they have played, Parnaby and Hosogi have encountered one tiebreak, with Hosogi emerging victorious in that particular situation.

Quality of opponents: Analyzing the average rank of Parnaby's opponents over the past year reveals an average rank of 307.94. Hosogi, on the other hand, has faced opponents with an average rank of 455.46. This information sheds light on the level of competition they have each encountered.

Deciding set performance in all matches: In the case of matches entering a deciding set, Parnaby has triumphed in 50% of such sets over the past twelve months. Hosogi, too, has achieved the same success rate of 50% in all matches played on the tour. This statistic is particularly valuable in live predictions and betting scenarios.

Current event head-to-head stats: While historical performance provides valuable insights, current event statistics also play a pivotal role in predicting tennis matches. Therefore, it is essential to refer to the section below (if available) to explore the players' performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players display superior performance at specific events, making this a crucial factor to consider when predicting the outcome.

Break point conversion: When analyzing their recent form, Parnaby has impressively converted 54.43% of breakpoint opportunities, while Hosogi has managed to convert 52.99% of their chances to break their opponents' serves. This statistic becomes particularly pertinent during live betting scenarios when one of the players has a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are interested in utilizing models that predict tennis matches, this article provides valuable insights. Please note that it caters primarily to statistics enthusiasts.

Sakura Hosogi vs Alana Parnaby Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Hosogi vs A. Parnaby H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Hosogi	Stats	A. Parnaby
3	H2H Matches Won	1
6	Sets Won	2
44	Games Won	30
1	Aces (Total)	5
9	Total Double Faults	16
1:37:53	Average Match Time	1:37:53
73% (156/215)	1st Serve %	65% (171/262)
63% (98/156)	1st Serve Win %	57% (97/171)
46% (27/59)	2nd Serve Win %	37% (34/91)
57% (20/35)	Break Pts Won %	50% (12/24)
50% (131/262)	Return Points Win %	42% (90/215)
75% (3/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	25% (1/4)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Hosogi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W100 Incheon - 22-09-2025
R2 Yiming DangY. Dang	L	6-2 1-6 7-6(4)	Stats
R1 On Yu ChoiO. Yu	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
W35 Nakhon Pathom - 01-09-2025
R1 Fangran TianF. Tian	L	6-2 4-6 6-4	Stats
W35 Nakhon Pathom - 25-08-2025
R2 Gaeul JangG. Jang	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Tanuchaporn YongmodT. Yongmod	W	6-3 1-0 ret.	Stats

View All

A. Parnaby Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W35 Launceston - 24-02-2025
R1 Ayumi KoshiishiA. Koshiishi	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
W35 Burnie - 17-02-2025
R2 Sakura HosogiS. Hosogi	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Fang An LinF. An	W	6-0 6-7(5) 7-5	Stats
W75 Brisbane - 03-02-2025
Q3 Lea MaL. Ma	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Q1 Lara WalkerL. Walker	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Hosogi vs A. Parnaby Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Hosogi	Stats	A. Parnaby
61.73% (250/155)	YTD Win/Loss	46.73% (186/212)
59.50% (548/373)	Sets Win/Loss	47.08% (419/471)
54.42% (4527/3791)	Games Win/Loss	49.63% (3972/4032)
63.64% (210/120)	Hard Win/Loss	45.99% (126/148)
50.00% (11/11)	Clay Win/Loss	45.24% (38/46)
48.65% (18/19)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (4/3)
68.75% (11/5)	Grass Win/Loss	54.55% (18/15)
0.05	Aces Per Game	0.1
190	Aces Total	378
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.27
994	Total Double Faults	1046
1:27:38	Average Match Time	1st Match
279.23	Average Opponent Rank	440.53
70% (16621/23752)	1st Serve %	62% (9543/15396)
58% (9610/16621)	1st Serve Win %	60% (5748/9543)
45% (3206/7131)	2nd Serve Win %	42% (2487/5853)
50% (1743/3455)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (802/1631)
49% (12016/24386)	Return Points Win %	44% (6397/14484)
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/3)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/4)
57.41% (155/115)	Challenger W/L	45.48% (136/163)
72.52% (95/36)	Futures W/L	52.63% (50/45)
61% (245/399)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (185/397)
67% (2/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
49% (37/75)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (27/57)
54% (60/111)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (46/93)
91% (232/210)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (182/157)
9% (232/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (182/25)
23% (173/39)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (216/29)