Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sam Querrey vs John Millman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Querrey vs Millman analysis and find out who is favored!
Sam Querrey vs John Millman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Querrey has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Millman has won 53.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Querrey, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Millman has won 63.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Querrey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Millman has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Querrey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Millman winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Querrey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 81/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 67/ 73). Millman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 269/ 169), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 39/ 37).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Querrey winning 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Querrey winning 7 and Millman winning 1. The last match between Querrey and Millman was at the Wimbledon - London, 06-07-2019, Third, Grass with Sam Querrey getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Querrey and Millman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Querrey winning 1 times and Millman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Querrey winning 2, and Millman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Querrey has played against opponents with an average rank of while Millman has played against players with an average rank of 122.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Querrey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Millman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Querrey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Millman has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Querrey 3 - 0 Millman
529
Rank
11
High
36
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
627
Rank
33
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
56% (483-375)
Career Total W/L
59% (452-320)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$7,761,555
Career Prize Money
$3,141,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sam Querrey | John Millman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 1 |
| Games Won | 49 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 47 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:8 | 1:39:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (148/252) | 60% (148/246) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (120/148) | 64% (94/148) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (53/104) | 65% (64/98) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (11/23) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (88/246) | 31% (79/252) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(8) 6-3 |
Stats 
Sam Querrey
Player
John Millman
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
27
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
85%
(
57 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
27 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
John Millman
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
John Millman
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sam Querrey | John Millman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (19/19) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 137 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (77/122) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (47/77) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (24/45) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (45/115) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sam Querrey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Sam Querrey
58%
(
74 of
128)
1st Serve %
61%
(
88 of
145)
13
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
18
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
68 of
88)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
17 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
60 of
145)
147
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Sam Querrey
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
19 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Sam Querrey
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
6
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
37 of
42)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
100%
(
38 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
24%
(
20 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
19 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Robin Haase
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
John Millman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
John Millman
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John Millman
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
John Millman
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
16
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John Millman
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
John Millman
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
John Millman
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
103
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Millman
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
116 of
171)
1st Serve %
62%
(
105 of
170)
9
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
90 of
116)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
75 of
105)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
51 of
171)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
57 of
170)
177
Total Points Won
164
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
John Millman
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Millman
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Millman
Player
Christopher O'Connell
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Querrey Vs Millman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
