Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Samantha Murray vs Chloe Paquet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Murray vs Paquet analysis and find out who is favored!
Samantha Murray vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Murray has won 34.21% of points on his second serve, while Paquet has won 45.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Murray, in recent form, has won 70.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 55.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.99% and 39.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Murray has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 52.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Murray has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Paquet winning 50.7% (W/L 36/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Murray has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 79/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 218/ 191), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Murray has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.92% of matches (W/L 27/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Murray winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Murray winning 0 and Paquet winning 2. The last match between Murray and Paquet was at the W80 Poitiers, 27-10-2021, First, I.hard with Chloe Paquet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Murray and Paquet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Murray winning 0 times and Paquet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Murray winning 0, and Paquet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Murray has played against opponents with an average rank of 315 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 248.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Murray has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Murray has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 43.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Murray 0 - 1 Paquet
658
Rank
165
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
154
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
56% (258-205)
Career Total W/L
52% (388-362)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
47% (9-10)
$58,319
Career Prize Money
$218,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Samantha Murray | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:56:0 | 0:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (25/45) | 69% (37/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 76% (28/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (9/20) | 65% (11/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (15/54) | 44% (20/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Samantha Murray
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Samantha Murray | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 45% (18/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (15/18) | 50% (178/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.5 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 82 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:29 | 1:47:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 315 | 268 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (65/103) | 58% (677/1168) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (38/65) | 62% (417/677) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 34% (13/38) | 45% (220/491) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (7/14) | 40% (70/175) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (44/102) | 46% (572/1248) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 44% (8/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Samantha Murray Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Samantha Murray
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
8
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
8
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Samantha Murray
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Samantha Murray
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samantha Murray
Player
Tara Moore
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samantha Murray
Player
Silvia Ambrosio
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samantha Murray
Player
Divine Dasam Nweke
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Samantha Murray
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
61%
(
30 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
115
Total Points Won
97
|
6-1 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Samantha Murray
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
10
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Samantha Murray
44%
(
14 of
32)
1st Serve %
79%
(
26 of
33)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Samantha Murray
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nikola Bartunkova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Chloe Paquet
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Korneeva
Player
Chloe Paquet
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Murray Vs Paquet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
