Samir Banerjee vs Alex Rybakov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Aug at 09:43 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Banerjee vs A. Rybakov

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Banerjee 2 - 0 Rybakov
They have played 5 sets in total, with Samir Banerjee winning 4 and Alex Rybakov winning 1. The last match between Samir Banerjee and Alex Rybakov was at the Chicago Challenger, 05-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Samir Banerjee getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Banerjee | 2 |
| Rybakov | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Chicago Challenger(08-05-25)
(F) M25 Dallas(07-13-25)
S. Banerjee vs A. Rybakov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $18,215 |
| 63.16% (72-42) | Career Total W/L | 60.11% (318-211) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 5 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Banerjee vs A. Rybakov Match Preview:
- On second serve performance, Rybakov edges out Banerjee, winning a higher percentage of points (47.98% vs. 43.35%) in recent months. Could this serve as a key advantage for Rybakov?
- Regarding return game statistics, Banerjee performs slightly better against second serves, capturing 45.37% of points compared to Rybakov's 43.61%. Does this indicate Banerjee's superior ability to handle second serves?
- First serve return points are more frequently won by Banerjee at 28.1%, outshining Rybakov's 25.98%, suggesting Banerjee might have the upper hand in handling first serves.
- When under pressure, Rybakov saves breakpoints more successfully with a 59.67% success rate, making him slightly more resilient than Banerjee, who saves 57.39%.
- Banerjee boasts a higher match win percentage over the past year (75.68% vs. 70.13%), possibly indicating overall greater consistency.
- Favorite playing surface for both is indoor hard courts, but Banerjee shows a stronger win rate at 81% compared to Rybakov's 64%. Will this surface preference play a pivotal role?
- The level of competition faced by Rybakov is generally higher, reflected in his more frequent participation in Challenger events, while Banerjee primarily competes in Futures/ITF tournaments.
- In direct head-to-head encounters, Banerjee has dominated, winning their only past match. Does this give Banerjee a psychological edge?
- In terms of performance in tiebreak and deciding set scenarios, both players have not faced each other in a tiebreak, but Banerjee has a better deciding set record, winning 77% of these instances.
- Break point conversion heavily favors Banerjee, as he converts 50.91% compared to Rybakov's 30.17%, potentially tipping the scales in crucial moments.
- Banerjee has been competing against lower-ranked opponents, suggesting he might not be as battle-tested as Rybakov, who faces a generally tougher competition.
Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming tennis match between Samir Banerjee and Alex Rybakov approaches, certain performance metrics provide valuable insights into potential outcomes. Banerjee has shown stronger performance in return games and breakpoint conversion, which could be instrumental in turning matches in his favor.
While Rybakov demonstrates superior stats on his second serve and slightly better ability to handle pressure situations, Banerjee’s experience in their previous head-to-head match might give him the psychological advantage.
The career surface performance also favors Banerjee, especially given the indoor hard court's impact. Although Rybakov has faced tougher competition at higher-level events, Banerjee’s edge in the deciding set record and breakpoint success cannot be ignored.
Considering the statistical edge across several key areas, Samir Banerjee appears more likely to triumph in this showdown.
Samir Banerjee vs Alex Rybakov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Banerjee vs A. Rybakov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 17 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:49:48 | Average Match Time | 1:49:48 |
| 61% (79/130) | 1st Serve % | 60% (108/180) |
| 78% (62/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (68/108) |
| 59% (30/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (30/72) |
| 24% (8/34) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 46% (82/180) | Return Points Win % | 29% (38/130) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Banerjee Recent Matches Played
A. Rybakov Recent Matches Played

S. Banerjee vs A. Rybakov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.16% (72/42) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.11% (318/211) |
| 61.26% (155/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.60% (714/484) |
| 55.39% (1285/1035) | Games Win/Loss | 54.08% (6185/5251) |
| 54.24% (32/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.48% (109/84) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.31% (162/98) |
| 78.95% (30/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.16% (46/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 359 | Aces Total | 1575 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 327 | Total Double Faults | 1055 |
| 1:35:11 | Average Match Time | 1:26:50 |
| 445.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 502.6 |
| 60% (4253/7125) | 1st Serve % | 67% (20190/30172) |
| 70% (2981/4253) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (14020/20190) |
| 50% (1433/2872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5166/9982) |
| 44% (379/867) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1275/3036) |
| 43% (3171/7345) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12072/30318) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Challenger W/L | 54.88% (118/97) |
| 65.56% (59/31) | Futures W/L | 65.22% (195/104) |
| 66% (70/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (313/517) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 33% (7/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (91/185) |
| 60% (18/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (65/142) |
| 90% (71/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (313/276) |
| 10% (71/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (313/35) |
| 17% (42/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (216/43) |