Samir Banerjee vs Cannon Kingsley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 04:51 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Banerjee vs C. Kingsley

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Banerjee 0 - 1 Kingsley
They have played 3 sets in total, with Samir Banerjee winning 1 and Cannon Kingsley winning 2. The last match between Cannon Kingsley and Samir Banerjee was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 27-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Banerjee | 0 |
| Kingsley | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Charlottesville Challenger(10-27-25)
S. Banerjee vs C. Kingsley H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.16% (72-42) | Career Total W/L | 57.96% (142-103) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Banerjee vs C. Kingsley Match Preview:
- Samir Banerjee has a slightly weaker recent performance on second serve points, winning 42.90%. In contrast, Cannon Kingsley edges ahead with 45.55% in this category. Could this impact the match outcome? Absolutely, as there's a strong link between second serve points and match predictions.
- In return game stats, Samir Banerjee surpasses Cannon Kingsley by winning 46.42% of his opponent's second serve points, compared to Cannon's 42.43%. Furthermore, Samir leads in first serve returns with 25.63% over Cannon's 24.92%. Samir's stronger return ability provides a potential advantage in this matchup.
- Under pressure, Samir Banerjee seems more resilient, saving 59.56% of breakpoints. Cannon Kingsley, on the other hand, saves 49.69%. This implies that Samir might excel under critical game moments, making him more reliable for in-game scenarios.
- How do their overall performances compare? Samir boasts a robust 76.74% match win rate (33/10) over the past year, while Cannon's success rate is 51.11% (23/22). This substantial difference highlights Samir as the more consistent player.
- Surfaces matter, where both show equal proficiency on Hard courts with a 54% win rate. Nonetheless, Samir's career highlight is on I.hard with an 81% win rate, while Cannon excels similarly on Clay.
- Samir performs impressively in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments with an 83.33% success rate, whereas Cannon engages with higher-level tournaments, achieving a 54.17% win rate. The varying event levels could be pivotal, but Samir holds a higher win percentage.
- An interesting aspect is the level of competition faced: Samir's opponents averaged a rank of 364.23, slightly tougher than Cannon's average opponent rank of 408.89. This suggests Samir might be better prepared for high-level opponents.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Samir has a dominant 69% win rate over the past 12 months, significantly outclassing Cannon's 36%. This could be a crucial factor if the match becomes tightly contested.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
Examining each player's strengths and weaknesses paints a clear picture of their current form. Samir Banerjee's superior performance in return games and his resilience under pressure are significant factors in his favor.
Moreover, Samir's consistency over the last year, highlighted by a high win percentage, suggests a stable and reliable level of play. Despite Cannon Kingsley's competitive event participation, Samir's success against slightly stronger opponents props up his potential.
Taking all aspects into consideration, including Samir’s ability to thrive in deciding sets, it appears he holds the upper hand. Therefore, Samir Banerjee is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Samir Banerjee vs Cannon Kingsley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Banerjee vs C. Kingsley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 18 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:13:22 | Average Match Time | 2:13:22 |
| 53% (50/95) | 1st Serve % | 56% (61/109) |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (49/61) |
| 49% (22/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (20/48) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 83% (5/6) |
| 37% (40/109) | Return Points Win % | 43% (41/95) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Banerjee Recent Matches Played
C. Kingsley Recent Matches Played

S. Banerjee vs C. Kingsley Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.16% (72/42) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.96% (142/103) |
| 61.26% (155/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.68% (318/243) |
| 55.39% (1285/1035) | Games Win/Loss | 53.77% (2867/2465) |
| 54.24% (32/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.46% (61/51) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.82% (34/21) |
| 78.95% (30/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.26% (47/31) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 359 | Aces Total | 1392 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 327 | Total Double Faults | 448 |
| 1:35:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 444.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.25 |
| 60% (4253/7125) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9415/15174) |
| 70% (2981/4253) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (6755/9415) |
| 50% (1433/2872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2989/5758) |
| 44% (379/867) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (593/1446) |
| 43% (3171/7345) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5920/15197) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Challenger W/L | 50.52% (49/48) |
| 65.56% (59/31) | Futures W/L | 64.14% (93/52) |
| 66% (70/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (140/242) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (7/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (30/69) |
| 60% (18/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (38/74) |
| 90% (71/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (140/122) |
| 10% (71/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (140/18) |
| 17% (42/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (105/20) |