Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Borna Gojo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 11:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Gueymard Wayenburg vs B. Gojo

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wayenburg 1 - 0 Gojo
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg winning 2 and Borna Gojo winning 1. The last match between Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg and Borna Gojo was at the Helsinki Challenger, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wayenburg | 1 |
| Gojo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Helsinki Challenger(11-04-25)
S. G. Wayenburg vs B. Gojo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $80,200 | Career Prize Money | $669,560 |
| 55.52% (161-129) | Career Total W/L | 58.37% (258-184) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-5) |
S. G. Wayenburg vs B. Gojo Match Preview:
- Could second serve performance play a decisive role? Borna Gojo slightly edges out Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg, winning 44.92% of points compared to 43.37% in recent form.
- In terms of return stats, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg holds a minor advantage on both second and first serves, winning 47.02% and 26.37% respectively, compared to Borna Gojo's 44.06% and 24.40%.
- Under pressure, Borna Gojo has a slight edge, saving 54.87% of breakpoints, whereas Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg saves 52.89%.
- Who has been more successful over the past year? Borna Gojo has a better win-loss percentage, achieving 52.78% while Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg has recorded 46.27%.
- On hard surfaces, both players have an identical career win rate of 61%, but Sascha struggles more on grass with only 25%, compared to Borna's 43%.
- Gojo has faced higher-ranked competitors on average, playing against those ranked 226.47 compared to Sascha's 319.99.
- In matches extending to a deciding set, Sascha holds a better record, winning 43% compared to Borna's 29% in the last 12 months.
- Both players have mostly played Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Gojo showing a stronger performance at 61.11% against Sascha's 48.21%.
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
Borna Gojo appears to have a slight advantage in several key areas, notably in second serve performance and overall win rate over the past year. His ability to save breakpoints is also a strength that slightly edges him over Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg.
While Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg shows strength in return stats and deciding set performance, these may not be substantial enough to outweigh Gojo's steadier performance and tougher competition faced.
Considering all the data points, Borna Gojo is favored to win the upcoming match, owing to his more consistent and higher level of performance across various metrics.
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Borna Gojo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. G. Wayenburg vs B. Gojo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 16 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:19:52 | Average Match Time | 2:19:52 |
| 58% (67/115) | 1st Serve % | 54% (55/101) |
| 70% (47/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (44/55) |
| 52% (25/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (17/46) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 40% (40/101) | Return Points Win % | 37% (43/115) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. G. Wayenburg Recent Matches Played
B. Gojo Recent Matches Played

S. G. Wayenburg vs B. Gojo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.52% (161/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.37% (258/184) |
| 55.16% (374/304) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.60% (600/460) |
| 52.28% (3375/3081) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (5519/4992) |
| 53.85% (42/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.31% (122/77) |
| 53.33% (40/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.87% (62/51) |
| 58.65% (78/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.81% (64/43) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 43.48% (10/13) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.66 |
| 1820 | Aces Total | 3401 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1310 | Total Double Faults | 1433 |
| 1:38:49 | Average Match Time | 1:37:46 |
| 441.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 437.24 |
| 57% (11622/20474) | 1st Serve % | 62% (19757/31639) |
| 73% (8443/11622) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (14580/19757) |
| 48% (4219/8852) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5864/11882) |
| 43% (902/2118) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1085/2705) |
| 41% (8447/20811) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11619/31158) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (7/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 48.94% (23/24) |
| 44.44% (40/50) | Challenger W/L | 60.47% (153/100) |
| 63.10% (118/69) | Futures W/L | 59.26% (48/33) |
| 55% (160/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (252/433) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 48% (45/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (113/217) |
| 46% (46/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (87/168) |
| 84% (167/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (261/213) |
| 16% (167/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (261/48) |
| 17% (123/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (180/43) |